Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function in humans at 7 T

The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of 7 T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantitatively assess left ventricular volumes, mass, and function from cine short‐axis series and left ventricular diastolic filling from velocity‐encoded MRI in 10 healthy volunteers. As comparative “gold standard,” the corresponding measures obtained at 1.5 T were taken. Left ventricular volumes, function, and mass were obtained by manual image segmentation. Trans‐mitral flow graphs were obtained from 2D one‐directional through‐plane velocity‐encoded MRI planned at the mitral valve in end‐systole. Imaging at 7 T MRI was successful in 80% of the examinations. Assessment of left ventricular volumes, function, and mass at 7 T showed good agreement with 1.5 T (no significant differences between variables describing volumes, function, and mass with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.96). Trans‐mitral stroke volume and the ratio between early and atrial peak filling rate showed strong agreement at both field strengths (no significant differences between stroke volumes and filling ratios with intraclass correlation coefficients 0.92 for stroke volumes and 0.77 for peak filling ratios). In conclusion, this study shows that assessing left ventricular volumes, function, and flow is feasible at 7 T MRI and that standardized MRI protocols provide similar quantitative results when compared with 1.5 T MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  H. Rinneberg,et al.  Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coils , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  M. Stuber,et al.  Initial results on in vivo human coronary MR angiography at 7 T , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Peter Andersen,et al.  Whole‐body imaging at 7T: Preliminary results , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Feasibility of Cardiac Gating Free of Interference With Electro-Magnetic Fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla Using an MR-Stethoscope , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[5]  C H Lorenz,et al.  Novel real‐time R‐wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Three‐dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Cardiac imaging at 7.0 T: comparison of pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram triggered 2D-CINE for LV-function assessment , 2010 .

[8]  A G Webb,et al.  Simple RF design for human functional and morphological cardiac imaging at 7tesla. , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[9]  Lawrence L Wald,et al.  Comparison of Cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Clinical Whole Body Systems , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[10]  R J van der Geest,et al.  Automated measurement of volume flow in the ascending aorta using MR velocity maps: evaluation of inter- and intraobserver variability in healthy volunteers. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  Debiao Li,et al.  Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  G J Metzger,et al.  Initial results of cardiac imaging at 7 tesla , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  M. E. Ladd,et al.  7 T Human in vivo Cardiac Imaging with an 8-Channel Transmit / Receive Array , 2008 .

[14]  E. E. van der Wall,et al.  Quantitative analysis of cardiovascular MR images , 1997, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[15]  R J van der Geest,et al.  Quantification in cardiac MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  M A Bernstein,et al.  A method for correctly setting the rf flip angle , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J. Carr,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 3.0 T: Comparison With Steady-State Free Precession Technique at 1.5 T , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[18]  Robert V Mulkern,et al.  Double inversion black‐blood fast spin‐echo imaging of the human heart: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[20]  S. Wolff,et al.  Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[21]  A N Garroway,et al.  Surface and gradiometer coils near a conducting body: the lift-off effect. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[22]  B. Stoel,et al.  MR velocity mapping of tricuspid flow: Correction for through‐plane motion , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Kieran Clarke,et al.  Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: A validation study , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  David N Firmin,et al.  Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.