Effect of joint mechanism on vehicle redirectional capability of water-filled road safety barrier systems.

Portable water-filled barriers (PWFBs) are roadside appurtenances that prevent vehicles from penetrating into temporary construction zones on roadways. PWFBs are required to satisfy the strict regulations for vehicle re-direction in tests. However, many of the current PWFBs fail to re-direct the vehicle at high speeds due to the inability of the joints to provide appropriate stiffness. The joint mechanism hence plays a crucial role in the performance of a PWFB system at high speed impacts. This paper investigates the desired features of the joint mechanism in a PWFB system that can re-direct vehicles at high speeds, while limiting the lateral displacement to acceptable limits. A rectangular "wall" representative of a 30m long barrier system was modeled and a novel method of joining adjacent road barriers was introduced through appropriate pin-joint connections. The impact response of the barrier "wall" and the vehicle was obtained and the results show that a rotational stiffness of 3000kNm/rad at the joints seems to provide the desired features of the PWFB system to re-direct impacting vehicles and restrict the lateral deflection. These research findings will be useful to safety engineers and road barrier designers in developing a new generation of PWFBs for increased road safety.

[1]  N J Garber,et al.  Crash characteristics at work zones. , 2001 .

[2]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction analysis of full scale vehicle-barrier impact using coupled SPH-FEA , 2014 .

[3]  Ala Tabiei,et al.  Roadmap for crashworthiness finite element simulation of roadside safety structures , 2000 .

[4]  Roger Zou,et al.  Roadside Hazard and Barrier Crashworthiness Issues Confronting Vehicle and Barrier Manufacturers and Government Regulators , 2005 .

[5]  T. B. Jones,et al.  Analysis of a safety barrier connection joint post-testing , 2008 .

[6]  Cing-Dao Kan,et al.  Development and validation of a vehicle suspension finite element model for use in crash simulations , 2004 .

[7]  S Shah,et al.  Water impact investigations for aircraft ditching analysis , 2010 .

[8]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of water-filled road safety barriers , 2013 .

[9]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Characterisation Of Connection MechanismsWithin Road Safety Barriers , 2008 .

[10]  J. D. Reid,et al.  Reconstruction techniques for energy-absorbing guardrail end terminals. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Freeway Work-Zone Crash Analysis and Risk Identification Using Multiple and Conditional Logistic Regression , 2008 .

[12]  G. Fourlaris,et al.  Dynamic responses of connections in road safety barriers , 2009 .

[13]  Jerry I. Lin,et al.  Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells , 1984 .

[14]  D. A. F. Bayton.  Evaluation Of Dynamic Connection Designs ForRoad Safety Barriers , 2009 .

[15]  J. Monaghan.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[16]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Racetrack SAFER barrier on temporary concrete barriers , 2013 .

[17]  Stuart Vaughan Newstead,et al.  ROAD ACCIDENTS IN AUSTRALIA , 2008 .

[18]  G Rechnitzer.  The new Australian/New Zealand Standard 3845:1999: 'Road safety barrier systems': performance evaluations? , 1999 .

[19]  A. Cox,et al.  Innovative Uses of Video Analysis , 2009 .

[20]  R A Zimmer,et al.  RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR THE SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY FEATURES , 1993 .

[21]  B Fishburn.  The new Australian/New Zealand barrier system standard AS/NZS 3845 , 1999 .

[22]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Impact & Energy Absorption of Road Safety Barriers by Coupled SPH/FEM , 2012 .

[23]  Rodney J. Troutbeck.  The role of crash testing in the development of a safer road transportation system , 1999 .

[24]  M. B. C. Ulker,et al.  Traffic Barriers under Vehicular Impact: From Computer Simulation to Design Guidelines , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..