On the decay of distractor-response episodes.

Distractor-to-distractor repetition effects can be explained by retrieval and/or inhibitory processes. Interestingly, the two accounts predict different effects from repeated distractors: Inhibition theories always predict benefits, whereas stimulus-response-retrieval theories predict an interaction of response repetition and distractor repetitions, resulting in benefits with response repetitions and costs with response changes. In the present experiment the time-course and the temporal separability of a stimulus-response episode on distractor-to-distractor repetitions were analyzed. The results showed that the interaction of response repetition and distractor repetitions was affected by a simple decay function. In addition, distractor repetition effects were affected by the temporal separability. In concert, the data yield evidence for retrieval-based explanations of distractor-to-distractor repetitions.

[1]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[2]  S. Tipper,et al.  A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. , 1994 .

[3]  W. Trammell Neill,et al.  Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. , 1987 .

[4]  Katherine M. Mathis,et al.  Transfer-Inappropriate Processing , 1998 .

[5]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  The Changing Pattern of Perceptual Analytic Strategies and Response Selection with Practice in a Two-Choice Reaction time task , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Attention and Priming: Inhibitory and Facilitatory Effects of Ignored Primes , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  L Hasher,et al.  On the time course of negative priming: Another look , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[10]  S. Tipper,et al.  Inhibition and Interference in Selective Attention: Some Tests of a Neural Network Model , 1996 .

[11]  S P Tipper,et al.  Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: time course and disruption. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[13]  E. Fox.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Influence of mapping complexity on negative priming for incompatible spatial mappings , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval , 1992 .

[16]  L Hasher,et al.  Age and inhibition. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  D. Wentura,et al.  Distractor Repetitions Retrieve Previous Responses to Targets , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Christian Frings,et al.  On distractor-repetition benefits in the negative-priming paradigm , 2007 .

[19]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? , 1992 .

[20]  Sustained suppression in congruency tasks , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Christian Frings,et al.  The time-course of masked negative priming. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[22]  Andrew R. A. Conway.  The time-course of negative priming: Little evidence for episodic trace retrieval , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[23]  B. Hommel.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  W. Neill,et al.  Mechanisms of transfer-inappropriate processing. , 2007 .

[25]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[26]  Richard Ridderinkhof.  Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks , 2002, Psychological research.

[27]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words. , 1979 .

[28]  Wim Notebaert,et al.  Sequential analysis of a Simon task – evidence for an attention-shift account , 2001, Psychological research.

[29]  B. DeSchepper,et al.  Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Inhibition in Cognition , 2007 .

[31]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  B. Hommel.  Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[33]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[34]  M C Smith,et al.  Repetition effect and short-term memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.