Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches

[1]  Yun-Ke Chang,et al.  Collaborative learning in wikis , 2011, Educ. Inf..

[2]  J. Sweller.  Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[3]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Design and effects of representational scripting on group performance , 2010 .

[5]  David W. Johnson,et al.  An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning , 2009 .

[6]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  Is a partner’s competence threatening during dyadic cooperative work? It depends on resource interdependence , 2009 .

[7]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Attention guidance during example study via the model's eye movements , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  F. Paas,et al.  A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks , 2009 .

[9]  Fred Paas,et al.  Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Fred Paas,et al.  Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  T. Gog,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations , 2009 .

[12]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Fred Paas,et al.  Individual Versus Group Learning as a Function of Task Complexity: An Exploration into the Measurement of Group Cognitive Load , 2008 .

[14]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[15]  E. Denessen,et al.  Dyad Composition Effects on Cognitive Elaboration and Student Achievement , 2008 .

[16]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, ICLS.

[17]  Cary J. Roseth,et al.  Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research , 2008 .

[19]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[20]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[21]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Fang Chen,et al.  Potential speech features for cognitive load measurement , 2007, OZCHI '07.

[23]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[24]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL , 2007 .

[25]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Automatic coding of online collaboration protocols , 2006 .

[27]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[29]  J. Sweller,et al.  Natural Information Processing Systems , 2006 .

[30]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[31]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[33]  Henny van der Meijden,et al.  Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[36]  Roya Ayman,et al.  Communication Medium and Member Familiarity , 2005 .

[37]  A. Garton,et al.  The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[38]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Tim S. Roberts.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. , 2005 .

[41]  T. Paulus,et al.  Collaboration or Cooperation? Analyzing Small Group Interactions in Educational Environments , 2005 .

[42]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[43]  Fred Paas,et al.  Exploring Multidimensional Approaches to the Efficiency of Instructional Conditions , 2004 .

[44]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[45]  J. Sweller.  Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[46]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[47]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  The development of argument skills. , 2003, Child development.

[48]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups Perform Better than the Best Individuals on Letters-to-numbers Problems: Effects of Group Size Two-letter Substitution Strategy , 2003 .

[49]  E. Paice,et al.  Collaborative learning , 2003, Medical education.

[50]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[51]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[53]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[54]  N. Webb,et al.  Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups , 2003 .

[55]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency , 2002 .

[56]  R. Scott Tindale,et al.  Shared Information, Cognitive Load, and Group Memory , 2002 .

[57]  N. Webb,et al.  Short Circuits or Superconductors? Effects of Group Composition on High-Achieving Students’ Science Assessment Performance , 2002 .

[58]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  The nature of students' sociocognitive activity in handling and processing multimedia-based science material in a small group learning task , 2001 .

[59]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  Computer Conferencing: An Environment for Collaborative Project-Based Learning in Distance Education , 2001 .

[60]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[61]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[62]  Leen Streefland,et al.  Collaborative learning and the construction of common knowledge , 2000 .

[63]  Selma Leitão,et al.  The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.

[64]  C. Boxtel,et al.  Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. , 2000 .

[65]  R. Tindale,et al.  ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups , 2000 .

[66]  M. Pressley,et al.  Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions , 1999 .

[67]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[68]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[69]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics , 1999 .

[70]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[71]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Chapter 1 (Introduction) What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'? , 1999 .

[72]  Alexander W. Chizhik,et al.  Equity Issues in Collaborative Group Assessment: Group Composition and Performance , 1998 .

[73]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[74]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[75]  Mary Susan Weldon,et al.  Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  Eleanor Armour-Thomas,et al.  Mathematical problem solving in small groups: Exploring the interplay of students' metacognitive behaviors, perceptions, and ability levels , 1997 .

[78]  J. Tudge,et al.  The cognitive consequences of collaborative problem solving with and without feedback , 1996 .

[79]  David Yamane,et al.  Collaboration and its discontents : Steps toward overcoming barriers to successful group projects , 1996 .

[80]  Nichols,et al.  The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Student Achievement and Motivation in a High School Geometry Class , 1996, Contemporary educational psychology.

[81]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The Effect of Positive Goal and Resource Interdependence on Individual Performance , 1996 .

[82]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[83]  R. Slavin.  Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. , 1996 .

[84]  Hans Spada,et al.  Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science , 1995 .

[85]  D. Wegner.  A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[86]  N. Webb,et al.  Constructive Activity and Learning in Collaborative Small Groups. , 1995 .

[87]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Recall suffers from collaboration: joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity , 1995 .

[88]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[89]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework , 1995 .

[90]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[91]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results , 1994 .

[92]  G. A. Miller.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[93]  Stephanie D. Teasley.  Constructing a Joint Problem Space: The Computer as a Tool for Sharing Knowledge , 1993 .

[94]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[95]  James D. Klein,et al.  Effects of cooperative learning and need for affiliation on performance, time on task, and satisfaction , 1992 .

[96]  Graham J. Hitch,et al.  Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. , 1992 .

[97]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[98]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[99]  R. Carey,et al.  Understanding instructions. , 1992, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[100]  N. Webb.  Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. , 1991 .

[101]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. , 1991 .

[102]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Goal and Resource Interdependence on Problem-Solving Success , 1989 .

[103]  J. Tudge.  When collaboration leads to regression-Some negative consequences of socio-cognitive conflict , 1989 .

[104]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[105]  G. Salomon,et al.  When teams do not function the way they ought to , 1989 .

[106]  Margrethe H. Olson,et al.  Encountering electronic work groups: a transaction costs perspective , 1988, CSCW '88.

[107]  S. Bossert,et al.  Cooperative Activities in the Classroom , 1988 .

[108]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[109]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[110]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  The Social Context of Instruction. Group Organization and Group Processes. [Papers Presented at a Conference Held at The Wisconsin Center for Education Research (Madison, May 1982).]. , 1987 .

[111]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[112]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .