Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production.

Theories of lexical production differ in whether they allow phonological processes to affect lexical selection directly. Whereas some accounts, such as interactive activation accounts, predict (weak) early effects of phonological processes during lexical selection via feedback connections, strictly serial architectures do not make this prediction. We present evidence from lexical selection during unscripted sentence production that lexical selection is affected by the phonological form of recently produced words. In a video description experiment, participants described scenes that were compatible with several near-meaning-equivalent verbs. We found that speakers were less likely than expected by chance to select a verb form that would result in phonological onset overlap with the subject of the sentence. Additional evidence from the distribution of disfluencies immediately preceding the verb argues that this effect is due to early effects on lexical selection, rather than later corrective processes, such as self-monitoring. Taken together, these findings support accounts that allow early feedback from phonological processes to word-level nodes, even during lexical selection.

[1]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical and Phonological Influences on Word Order , 2009, Psychological science.

[2]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[3]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[4]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Albert Costa,et al.  Planning at the Phonological Level during Sentence Production , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  A Critique of Top-down Independent Levels Models of Speech Production: Evidence from Non-plan-Internal Speech Errors , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Matthew A Goldrick,et al.  Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence , 2006 .

[8]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[9]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[10]  Michael P. Sullivan,et al.  The Nature of Phonological Encoding During Spoken Word Retrieval , 1999 .

[11]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Comprehension-Based Versus Production-Internal Feedback in Planning Spoken Words: A Rejoinder to Rapp and Goldrick (2004) , 2004 .

[12]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[13]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .

[14]  Arthur G Samuel,et al.  A reason to rhyme: phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  S. Brennan,et al.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  41 Peggy Babcock'S Relatives , 1980 .

[17]  Mark C. Smith,et al.  Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Gary S Dell,et al.  Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production , 2008, Language and cognitive processes.

[19]  H Schriefers,et al.  Priming Effects from Phonologically Related Distractors in Picture—Word Interference , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production , 2003 .

[21]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: evidence from neuropsychology , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[23]  K. Bock An Effect of the Accessibility of Word Forms on Sentence Structures , 1987 .

[24]  Albert Costa,et al.  Abstract phonological structure in language production : Evidence from Spanish , 1998 .

[25]  Eric Keller,et al.  Motor and Sensory Processes of Language , 2013 .

[26]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm , 2003 .

[27]  D. Mackay The Organization of Perception and Action , 1987 .

[28]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[29]  B. Rapp,et al.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.

[30]  A. Ellis Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[31]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  R. R. Peterson,et al.  Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .

[33]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Phonological Encoding of Sentence Production , 2011, CogSci.

[34]  Gary S Dell,et al.  Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[36]  Albert Costa,et al.  Regular and Irregular Morphology and its Relation with Agrammatism: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan , 2004, Cortex.

[37]  Eric Keller,et al.  The Role of Word-Onset Consonants in Speech Production Planning: New Evidence from Speech Error Patterns , 2013 .

[38]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[39]  V. Ferreira Ambiguity, Accessibility, and a Division of Labor for Communicative Success. , 2008, Learning and motivation.

[40]  W. Cooper,et al.  Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. , 1980 .

[41]  G. Dell,et al.  A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-Step Model of Lexical Access: Evidence from Picture Naming. , 2006 .

[42]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A Word-Order Constraint on Phonological Activation , 2008, Psychological science.

[43]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production : Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms , 1998 .

[44]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production , 2007 .

[45]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Phonological Segments and Features as Planning Units in Speech Production , 1999 .

[46]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data , 1981 .

[47]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  The organization of perception and action. A theory for language and other cognitive skills , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.