A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a promising analysis method that is being increasingly applied to fMRI data. A principal advantage of this approach is its applicability to cognitive paradigms for which detailed models of brain activity are not available. Independent component analysis has been successfully utilized to analyze single‐subject fMRI data sets, and an extension of this work would be to provide for group inferences. However, unlike univariate methods (e.g., regression analysis, Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistics), ICA does not naturally generalize to a method suitable for drawing inferences about groups of subjects. We introduce a novel approach for drawing group inferences using ICA of fMRI data, and present its application to a simple visual paradigm that alternately stimulates the left or right visual field. Our group ICA analysis revealed task‐related components in left and right visual cortex, a transiently task‐related component in bilateral occipital/parietal cortex, and a non‐task‐related component in bilateral visual association cortex. We address issues involved in the use of ICA as an fMRI analysis method such as: (1) How many components should be calculated? (2) How are these components to be combined across subjects? (3) How should the final results be thresholded and/or presented? We show that the methodology we present provides answers to these questions and lay out a process for making group inferences from fMRI data using independent component analysis. Hum. Brain Mapping 14:140–151, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[2]  J. Rissanen.  A UNIVERSAL PRIOR FOR INTEGERS AND ESTIMATION BY MINIMUM DESCRIPTION LENGTH , 1983 .

[3]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[5]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Woods.  Modeling for Intergroup Comparisons of Imaging Data , 1996, NeuroImage.

[9]  Juha Karhunen,et al.  On Neural Blind Separation with Noise Suppression and Redundancy Reduction , 1997, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[10]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Latencies in fMRI time‐series: effect of slice acquisition order and perception , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  S Makeig,et al.  Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the stroop color-naming task. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI data: Examining the assumptions , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[13]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[14]  B. Biswal,et al.  Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  M. McKeown.  Detection of Consistently Task-Related Activations in fMRI Data with Hybrid Independent Component Analysis , 2000, NeuroImage.

[16]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[17]  V D Calhoun,et al.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task‐related waveforms , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[18]  T. Adali,et al.  INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS APPLIED TO FMRI DATA: A NATURAL MODEL AND ORDER SELECTION , 2001 .