NON-LINEAR EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION TO SATELLITE VIBRATION TEST DATA

The DYNAMITED project realised by a European space industry and university team associated around EADS ASTRIUM and funded by the European Space Agency (ESA) aimed to assess and improve dynamic test data. In the field of post test activities, the detection, characterisation, identification and prediction of the non-linear behaviour of space structures during tests is of prime importance. The paper therefore starts with a short overview of such methods. Present evaluation methods for spacecraft vibration tests are based on the assump- tion of linear structural behaviour. The resonance shifts and frequency response (FRF) peak variations observed in the case of non-linear structural behaviour are generally not reflected in practice by non-linear evaluation procedures. In order to avoid overloading of the struc- ture during the qualification test on a shaking table the dynamic response is generally con- trolled at specified levels and locations by input notching. This approach generates an effectively quasi linear structural behaviour at the different input levels which enables the utilization of classical linear modal extraction tools to be applied separately at each level. However, the measured dynamic responses (transmissibilities) reveal peak shifts and ampli- tude changes depending on the input level of the base excitation. In the paper an approach is presented where three different input levels are used with the response levels controlled to be constant within a narrow frequency band around the dominant resonances. The premises of a technique will be described and how its aim of predicting the responses to not measured input

[1]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Identification of nonlinear structural elements by force-state mapping , 1984 .

[2]  M. Böswald,et al.  Identification of Non-linear Joint Parameters by using Frequency Response Residuals , 2005 .

[3]  Jan R. Wright,et al.  Identification of Multi-Degree of Freedom Weakly Non-linear Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Michael Link,et al.  Modelling and updating of local non-linearities using frequency response residuals , 2003 .

[5]  Marc Böswald,et al.  Linking Analysis to Test - Parameter Identification and Validation , 2004 .

[6]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Summary and comparing overview of techniques for the detection of non-linear distortions , 2002 .

[8]  K. Worden,et al.  Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics , 2006 .

[9]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  A Nonparametric Identification Technique for Nonlinear Dynamic Problems , 1979 .

[10]  Marc Böswald,et al.  A Review of Experimental Modal Analysis Methods with respect to their Applicability to Test Data of Large Aircraft Structures , 2006 .

[11]  Cyril M. Harris,et al.  Shock and vibration handbook , 1976 .

[12]  Nuno M. M. Maia,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  D. Inman Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling , 2002 .

[14]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design , 1968 .

[15]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Detection and quantification of structural non-linearities , 2002 .

[16]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[17]  Geoffrey R. Tomlinson,et al.  Frequency response characteristics of structures with single and multiple clearance-type non-linearity , 1984 .

[18]  Erhan Budak,et al.  Iterative receptance method for determining harmonic response of structures with symmetrical non-linearities , 1993 .

[19]  Dennis Göge,et al.  Detection and description of non-linear phenomena in experimental modal analysis via linearity plots , 2005 .