Augmented vision and interactive monitoring in 3D printing process

This paper describes the beneficial impact of an augmented reality based technique on the 3D printing process monitoring within additive manufacturing machines. A marker is applied in a fixed point of the rapid prototyping machine, integral with the component being manufactured; as an alternative, a markerless approach can be followed too. A virtual model of the object to be printed is superimposed to the real one. In this way, the shape of the object in different printing stages can be viewed. An interactive comparison between real and virtual model can be carried out both in manual and automatic mode. If manufacturing errors are detected, the building process can be stopped. Augmented reality technique allows an intuitive shape check of a part being printed with rapid prototyping technologies. In case of complex objects it helps the operator in the detection of possible errors along the manufacturing process; stopping the machine as soon as an error appears avoids waste of machining time and material. The average precision of the augmented reality is useful to find significant geometrical errors; geometrical deviations less than 1 mm can hardly be assessed both in manual and in automatic mode, and further studies should be carried out to increase the technique precision and range of application. To the best of the authors’ knowledge it is the first time where experiments on the integration between augmented reality and rapid prototyping to interactively monitor 3D parts’ printing have been investigated and reported in literature.

[1]  Giuseppe Monno,et al.  Text Readability in Head-Worn Displays: Color and Style Optimization in Video versus Optical See-Through Devices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing , 2012 .

[3]  Y Zhang,et al.  A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis , 2008 .

[4]  Robert C. Pennington,et al.  Significant factors in the dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling , 2005 .

[5]  Alessandro Ceruti,et al.  Interactive GT Code Management for Mechanical Part Similarity Search and Cost Prediction , 2010 .

[6]  R. Dhakshyani,et al.  FDM models and FEA in dysplastic hip , 2012 .

[7]  Neri Oxman,et al.  Variable property rapid prototyping , 2011 .

[8]  Lan-Rong Dung,et al.  Implementation of RANSAC Algorithm for Feature-Based Image Registration , 2013 .

[9]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Cyrus Aghanajafi,et al.  Influence of Layer Thickness on the Design of Rapid-Prototyped Models , 2009 .

[11]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Materializing design: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design , 2006 .

[12]  Gi Dae Kim,et al.  A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: Quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost , 2008 .

[13]  P. Wright,et al.  Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS , 2002 .

[14]  Alessandro Ceruti,et al.  Tablet-based 3D sketching and curve reverse modelling , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol..

[15]  Ryan B. Wicker,et al.  3D printer selection: A decision-making evaluation and ranking model , 2013 .

[16]  Luca De Marchi,et al.  Augmented Reality to Support On-Field Post-Impact Maintenance Operations on Thin Structures , 2013, J. Sensors.

[17]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features , 2006, ECCV.

[19]  Marcello Pellicciari,et al.  Real-time 3D features reconstruction through monocular vision , 2010 .