Generalist genes: implications for the cognitive sciences

In the 'generalist genes' hypothesis, it is suggested that the same genes affect most cognitive abilities and disabilities. This recently proposed hypothesis is based on considerable multivariate genetic research showing that there is substantial genetic overlap between such broad areas of cognition as language, reading, mathematics and general cognitive ability. We assume that the hypothesis is correct and consider here its implications for cognitive neuroscience. In our opinion, the two key genetic concepts of pleiotropy (in which one gene affects many traits) and polygenicity (in which many genes affect a trait) that underlie the generalist genes hypothesis imply a 'generalist brain'. That is, the genetic input into brain structure and function is general not specific.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: a brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  M. Owen,et al.  The genetic basis of complex human behaviors. , 1994, Science.

[3]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Response-Selection-Related Parietal Activation during Number Comparison , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  David Gaffan.  Widespread Cortical Networks Underlie Memory and Attention , 2005, Science.

[5]  Takuro Tamura,et al.  Investigation of protein functions through data-mining on integrated human transcriptome database, H-Invitational database (H-InvDB). , 2005, Gene.

[6]  D. Garlick.  Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: the role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. , 2002, Psychological review.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Numerical Magnitude in the Human Parietal Lobe Tests of Representational Generality and Domain Specificity , 2004, Neuron.

[8]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Ventral Striatum/Nucleus Accumbens Activation to Smoking-Related Pictorial Cues in Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  H. Duffau,et al.  Direct Evidence for a Parietal-Frontal Pathway Subserving Spatial Awareness in Humans , 2005, Science.

[10]  S. Greenberg,et al.  DNA microarray gene expression analysis technology and its application to neurological disorders , 2001, Neurology.

[11]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[12]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Behavioral genetics in the postgenomic era , 2003 .

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[14]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Arithmetic and the Brain This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited the Intraparietal Sulcus and Number Sense Number Sense in the Animal Brain , 2022 .

[15]  S. Gray,et al.  DNA microarray gene expression analysis of a vocal fold polyp and granuloma. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  J Douglas Armstrong,et al.  Synapse proteomics of multiprotein complexes: en route from genes to nervous system diseases. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[17]  S. Grant,et al.  The proteomes of neurotransmitter receptor complexes form modular networks with distributed functionality underlying plasticity and behaviour , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Looking down on human intelligence , 2000 .

[19]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[20]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[21]  J. Mattick.  The Functional Genomics of Noncoding RNA , 2005, Science.

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Functional and Structural Alterations of the Intraparietal Sulcus in a Developmental Dyscalculia of Genetic Origin , 2003, Neuron.

[23]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Generalist genes and cognitive neuroscience , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Seth G. N. Grant,et al.  An integrative neuroscience program linking mouse genes to cognition and disease. , 2003 .

[25]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The general factor of intelligence : how general is it? , 2002 .

[26]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Human intelligence differences: towards a combined experimental–differential approach , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetics and general cognitive ability (g) , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  R. Plomin,et al.  Generalist genes and learning disabilities. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  S. Batalov,et al.  A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  G. Church,et al.  A global view of pleiotropy and phenotypically derived gene function in yeast , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[31]  I. Craig,et al.  The quest for quantitative trait loci associated with intelligence , 2006 .