Primacy Effects and the Role of Risk in Auditor Belief-Revision Processes

Numerous studies in the audit judgment literature provide evidence indicating that auditors can be susceptible to recency effects. This study extends the research by examining auditor susceptibility to primacy, an order effect, which, like recency, can lead to suboptimal audit‐planning decisions (see Ashton and Ashton 1988) and yet, unlike recency, has received very little attention in the accounting literature. Specifically, the research investigates whether primacy effects in auditor belief revisions are a conditional function of the level of inherent risk present in the audit environment (high/low) and the nature of the information contained in the latter portion of the information sequence (e.g., whether the information is positive or negative with respect to the client's internal controls). The results, consistent with expectations, indicate that auditors are susceptible to primacy effects when making likelihood of error and audit‐hour planning judgments in settings that are relatively low in inheren...

[1]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[2]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Evidence-responsiveness in professional judgment: Effects of positive versus negative evidence and presentation mode , 1990 .

[3]  Terry L. Campbell,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION ORDER AND HYPOTHESIS-TESTING STRATEGIES ON AUDITORS' JUDGMENTS. , 1989 .

[4]  William D. Crano,et al.  Primacy versus Recency in Retention of Information and Opinion Change , 1977 .

[5]  S. Fiske,et al.  The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition , 1983 .

[6]  N. Anderson Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[7]  Mark F. Zimbelman The Effects of Sas No. 82 on Auditors' Attention to Fraud Risk Factors and Audit Planning Decisions , 1997 .

[8]  Thomas Kida,et al.  The Impact of Hypothesis-Testing Strategies on Auditors' Use of Judgment Data , 1984 .

[9]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? , 1983 .

[10]  Thomas Kida,et al.  The effect of risk factors on auditors' configural information processing , 1993 .

[11]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The effects of leadership involvement and the importance of the task on subordinates' performance , 1976 .

[12]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  THE EFFECT OF HYPOTHESIS FRAMING: PRIOR EXPECTATIONS AND CUE DIAGNOSTICITY ON AUDITORS'... , 1989 .

[13]  S. K. Asare,et al.  The auditors' going concern opinion decision: Interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence. , 1989 .

[14]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Debiasing Audit Judgment With Accountability - A Framework And Experimental Results , 1993 .

[15]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Effects of Varying Trait Inconsistency and Response Requirements on the Primacy Effect in Impression Formation. , 1970 .

[16]  William F. Messier,et al.  Sequential auditor decision making: Information search and evidence evaluation* , 1990 .

[17]  C. R. Bybee Testing a Process Model of Involvement , 1978 .

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[19]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation , 1963 .

[20]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Mario J. Maletta An Examination of Auditors' Decisions to Use Internal Auditors as Assistants: The Effect of Inherent Risk* , 1993 .

[22]  William F. Messier The Sequencing of Audit Evidence: Its Impact on the Extent of Audit Testing and Report Formulation , 1992 .

[23]  Thomas Kida,et al.  Heuristics and biases: Expertise and task realism in auditing. , 1991 .

[24]  R. Arkin,et al.  The Effect of Commitment on Expectancy Value and Expectancy Weight in Social Decision Making , 1979 .

[25]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[26]  Alvin A. Arens,et al.  Auditing: An Integrated Approach , 1976 .

[27]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[28]  R. Heslin,et al.  Information search as a function of stimulus uncertainty and the importance of the response. , 1972 .