A semi‐automated method for measuring femoral shape to derive version and its comparison with existing methods

The measurement of femoral version is important in surgical planning of derotational osteotomies particularly for patients with proximal femoral deformity. It is, however, difficult to measure version accurately and differences of 10° to 15° have been found between repeated measurements. The aim of this work was first to develop a method of measuring femoral version angle where the definition of the neck axis is based on the three-dimensional point cloud making up the neck, second to automate many of the processes involved thus reducing the influence of human error and third to ensure the method could run on freely available software suitable for most computer platforms. A CT scan was performed on 44 cadaveric femurs to generate point clouds of the femoral surfaces. The point clouds were then analysed semi-automatically to determine femoral version angle between a neck axis defined by the bone surface points belonging only to the neck and a femoral condylar axis. The results from the neck fitting method were compared against three other methods typically used in the clinic (Murphy, Reikeras and Lee methods). Version angle measured by the new method gave 19.1° ± 7.3° (mean ± standard deviation) for the set of cadaveric femurs, 3.5° lower than the Murphy method and 6.8° and 11.0° higher than the Reikeras and Lee 2D methods respectively. The results demonstrate a method of measuring femoral version angle incorporating a high level of automation running on free software.

[1]  Nobuhiko Sugano,et al.  Three-Dimensional Shape of the Dysplastic Femur: Implications for THR , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  M. Aickin,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[3]  Michael Hardisty,et al.  Functional and Anatomic Orientation of the Femoral Head , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  P. Kingsley,et al.  A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  R. Bloebaum,et al.  Measurement of Femoral Anteversion by Biplane Radiography and Computed Tomography Imaging: Comparison With an Anatomic Reference , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Eun Kyoo Song,et al.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC® system , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[7]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[8]  Banchong Mahaisavariya,et al.  Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  G. Lausten,et al.  Measurement of anteversion of the femoral neck. Ultrasound and computerised tomography compared. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  N. Verdonschot,et al.  Computed tomography determined femoral torsion is not accurate , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  P. Noble,et al.  The cam impinging femur has multiple morphologic abnormalities. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Elhadi Sariali,et al.  Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis. Analysis of the femoral offset. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  P. Noble,et al.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  L. Dias,et al.  CT determination of femoral torsion. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  E Fønstelien,et al.  Evaluation of Three Methods for Measurement of Femoral Neck Anteversion , 1989, Acta radiologica.

[16]  O. Reikerås,et al.  Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1983, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  F Miller,et al.  Femoral Version and Neck Shaft Angle , 1993, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[18]  Paul Geladi,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 1987, Comprehensive Chemometrics.

[19]  S. I. Kim,et al.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[20]  D. Weiner,et al.  Computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion. , 1978, Orthopedics.

[21]  Damian Craiem,et al.  Towards automatic measurement of anteversion and neck–shaft angles in human femurs using CT images , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[22]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .