Simulation-driven design using surrogate-based optimization and variable-resolution computational fluid dynamic models

Reliable and robust computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers are nowadays commonly utilized in the design and analyses of various engineering systems, such as aircraft, turbomachinery, ships, and automotives. Although this has resulted in a drastic decrease of the number of prototype and experimental testing, the use of CFD in the design automation process is still limited. In practice, the geometry parameters that ensure satisfaction of assumed performance requirements are often obtained by repetitive CFD simulations guided by engineering experience. This is a tedious process which does not guarantee optimal results. On the other hand, straight forward automation attempts by employing the CFD solvers directly in the optimization loop are typically impractical, even when using adjoint sensitivity information, because high-fidelity CFD simulations tend to be computationally very expensive. In this paper, we describe a surrogate-based design optimization methodology that shifts the computational burden from the accurate and expensive high-fidelity CFD model to its fast and yet reasonably accurate surrogate. As the surrogate models are computationally much cheaper than the high-fidelity ones, the cost of the design process is greatly reduced. Here, the surrogates are constructed using low-fidelity CFD models and response correction techniques. Application examples, involving the design of axisymmetric hulls in subsonic flow, and airfoils in both subsonic and transonic flows, are presented.

[1]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  A. Jameson,et al.  Design Optimization of High-Lift Configurations Using a Viscous Continuous Adjoint Method , 2002 .

[3]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[4]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Improved Distributed Hypercube Sampling , 2002 .

[5]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Simulation-Driven Antenna Design Using Surrogate-Based Optimization , 2013 .

[6]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[7]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  First-Order Model Management With Variable-Fidelity Physics Applied to Multi-Element Airfoil Optimization , 2000 .

[8]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space-mapping-based interpolation for engineering optimization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[9]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[10]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[11]  Laurent Dumas,et al.  CFD-based Optimization for Automotive Aerodynamics , 2008 .

[12]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[13]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space mapping , 2008, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[14]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Transonic Airfoil Design by the Inverse Method using Variable-fidelity Modelling , 2011, SIMULTECH.

[15]  Nicholas I. M. Gould,et al.  Trust Region Methods , 2000, MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization.

[16]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective , 1982 .

[17]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Optimization with variable-fidelity models applied to wing design , 1999 .

[18]  Jacob Søndergaard Optimization using surrogate models - by the space mapping technique , 2003 .

[19]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Multi-Fidelity Multi-Grid Design Optimization of Planar Microwave Structures with Sonnet , 2010 .

[20]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Wing Design by Numerical Optimization , 1977 .

[21]  René Van den Braembussche,et al.  Numerical Optimization for Advanced Turbomachinery Design , 2008 .

[22]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Variable-Fidelity Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2011, Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms.

[23]  George S. Dulikravich,et al.  Aerodynamic shape design and optimization , 1991 .

[24]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Viscous Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wings including Planform Variables , 2003 .

[25]  R. Pletcher,et al.  Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer. By D. A ANDERSON, J. C. TANNEHILL and R. H. PLETCHER. Hemisphere, 1984. 599 pp. $39.95. , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Richard H. Pletcher,et al.  Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer , 1984 .

[27]  Leifur Leifsson,et al.  Variable-fidelity aerodynamic shape optimisation of single-element airfoils at high-lift conditions , 2011, Int. J. Math. Model. Numer. Optimisation.

[28]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Optimization using surrogate models and partially converged computational fluid dynamics simulations , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections , 1959 .

[30]  F. Guibault,et al.  Optimized Nonuniform Rational B-Spline Geometrical Representation for Aerodynamic Design of Wings , 2001 .

[31]  Stefano Pieri,et al.  Multi-objective Optimization for Problems Involving Convective Heat Transfer , 2008 .

[32]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space mapping: the state of the art , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[33]  R. Lewis,et al.  An Overview of First-Order Model Management for Engineering Optimization , 2001 .

[34]  Francis Noblesse,et al.  Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms , 2001 .

[35]  S Koziel,et al.  Shape-Preserving Response Prediction for Microwave Design Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[36]  S. Gunn Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression , 1998 .

[37]  Leifur Þ. Leifsson,et al.  Transonic Airfoil Shape Optimization Using Variable- Resolution Models and Pressure Distribution Alignment , 2011 .

[38]  P. Hemker,et al.  Manifold mapping: a two-level optimization technique , 2008 .

[39]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design using the Euler equations , 1994 .

[40]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Multi-fidelity Design Optimization of Axisymmetric Bodies in Incompressible Flow , 2011, SIMULTECH.