Real-time risk analysis of safety systems

Methods for plant-specific, real-time, risk assessment are presented using Bayesian analysis with copulas. These are used to develop: (i) a forecasting analyzer that predicts the frequencies of occurrence of abnormal events, (ii) a reliability analyzer that predicts the failure probabilities of safety systems involving equipment and human actions, and (iii) an accident closeness analyzer that predicts the fuzzy memberships to various critical zones, indicating the proximity of a current plant state to a failure or disaster, through the use of accident precursor data. These methods, which involve repetitive risk analysis after abnormal events occur, are especially beneficial for operations involving complex nonlinearities and multi-component interactions, helping to achieve inherently safer operations. Furthermore, these methods demonstrate the importance of using plant-specific estimates of failure probabilities rather than generic values in the risk assessment of chemical plants. In this analysis, the propagations of abnormal events through the safety systems are modeled in real-time using SIMULINK and ASPEN DYNAMICS. The analysis methods are illustrated for a continuous ethyl benzene process.

[1]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  Application of signed digraphs-based analysis for fault diagnosis of chemical process flowsheets , 2004, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[2]  William L. Luyben.  Plantwide Dynamic Simulators in Chemical Processing and Control , 2002 .

[3]  Chuei-Tin Chang,et al.  Fuzzy diagnosis method for control systems with coupled feed forward and feedback loops , 2006 .

[4]  H. K. Fauske.  Emergency relief system design for runaway chemical reaction: extension of the DIERS methodology , 1989 .

[5]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou.  Mathematical Foundations of Event Trees , 1998 .

[6]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou,et al.  Functional Block Diagrams and Automated Construction of Event Trees (PSAM-0057) , 1998 .

[8]  Bill Ravens,et al.  An Introduction to Copulas , 2000, Technometrics.

[9]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part III: Process history based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  George Stephanopoulos,et al.  Chemical Process Control: An Introduction to Theory and Practice , 1983 .

[11]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Intelligent systems for HAZOP analysis of complex process plants , 2000 .

[12]  Dilip K. Das.  Emergency relief system design: In case of fire, break assumptions , 2004 .

[13]  Vicki M. Bier,et al.  An Application of Copulas to Accident Precursor Analysis , 1998 .

[14]  Ccps.  Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  G. Baumont,et al.  Quantifying human and organizational factors in accident management using decision trees: the HORAAM method , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part II: Qualitative models and search strategies , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Near‐Miss Incident Management in the Chemical Process Industry , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  Warren D. Seider,et al.  Plant-specific dynamic failure assessment using Bayesian theory , 2006 .

[19]  K. C. Tan,et al.  Intelligent alarm management in a petroleum refinery : Plant safety and environment , 2004 .

[20]  J. N. Sørensen,et al.  Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  The Bayesian choice , 1994 .