Under which conditions do the skin and probe decouple during sinusoidal vibrations?

Abstract Previous experiments performed on monkey and human fingertips suggested that the skin surface and stimulus probe decouple for sinusoidal displacements applied perpendicularly to the skin surface. From these observations, it was concluded that sinusoidal vibration may not be a suitable stimulus for understanding and modeling the tactile system. We repeated these experiments on human observers using stimulus frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 240 Hz and with displacement amplitudes up to 1 mm peak-to-peak (p-p). The skin and probe movements were measured in the steady-state using stroboscopic illumination and video microscopy. Contrary to previous conclusions, we found that decoupling did not occur for amplitudes less then 0.25 mm p-p, regardless of stimulus frequency. Decoupling was only observed for stimulus amplitudes greater than 0.25 mm over the stimulus-frequency range investigated. To further investigate this effect, a modified stimulus contactor was used, which permitted the measurement of the skin’s movement using reflected light. Measurements were made on both the index fingertip and the thenar eminence. Regardless of body site, no decoupling between the skin and stimulus probe was observed for frequencies ranging from 20 to 100 Hz up to displacements of 0.25 mm p-p. These levels are well within the range used in most human psychophysical experiments performed on these parts of the body. We conclude that sinusoidal vibration can be used reliably to stimulate the tactile system and is an appropriate stimulus for developing models of touch.

[1]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J D Greenspan,et al.  A comparison of force and depth of skin indentation upon psychophysical functions of tactile intensity. , 1984, Somatosensory research.

[3]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  The Psychophysics of Tactile Perception and its Peripheral Physiological Basis , 1996 .

[5]  W. Larrabee,et al.  A finite element model of skin deformation. II. An experimental model of skin deformation , 1986, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  A. Freeman,et al.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  T. J. Moore A Survey of the Mechanical Characteristics of Skin and Tissue in Response to Vibratory Stimulation , 1970 .

[8]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[9]  Clayton L. Van Doren,et al.  A model of spatiotemporal tactile sensitivity linking psychophysics to tissue mechanics. , 1989 .

[10]  Ronald T. Verrillo Vibrotactile thresholds measured at the finger , 1971 .

[11]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  An investigation of the mechanics of tactile sense using two-dimensional models of the primate fingertip. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  R. Johansson,et al.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements , 1982, Brain Research.

[13]  C. Van Doren,et al.  A model of spatiotemporal tactile sensitivity linking psychophysics to tissue mechanics. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  E. Franke,et al.  Mechanical impedance of the surface of the human body. , 1951, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  R. T. Verrillo,et al.  Effect of Contactor Area on the Vibrotactile Threshold , 1963 .

[16]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  W. Larrabee A finite element model of skin deformation. I. Biomechanics of skin and soft tissue: A review , 1986, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Comparison of sound-transmission and cochlear-microphonic characteristics in Mongolian gerbil and guinea pig. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  T. J. Moore,et al.  Measurement of Specific Mechanical Impedance of the Skin: Effects of Static Force, Site of Stimulation, Area of Probe, and Presence of a Surround , 1972 .