Review of uncertainty sources affecting the long-term predictions of space debris evolutionary models

Abstract Since the launch of Sputnik-I in 1957, the amount of space debris in Earth׳s orbit has increased continuously. Historically, besides abandoned intact objects (spacecraft and orbital stages), the primary sources of space debris in Earth׳s orbit were (i) accidental and intentional break-ups which produced long-lasting debris and (ii) debris released intentionally during the operation of launch vehicle orbital stages and spacecraft. In the future, fragments generated by collisions are expected to become a significant source as well. In this context, and from a purely mathematical point of view, the orbital debris population in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) should be intrinsically unstable, due to the physics of mutual collisions and the relative ineffectiveness of natural sink mechanisms above~700 km. Therefore, the real question should not be “if”, but “when” the exponential growth of the space debris population is supposed to start. From a practical point of view, and in order to answer the previous question, since the end of the 1980׳s several sophisticated long-term debris evolutionary models have been developed. Unfortunately, the predictions performed with such models, in particular beyond a few decades, are affected by considerable uncertainty. Such uncertainty comes from a relative important number of variables that being either under the partial control or completely out of the control of modellers, introduce a variability on the long-term simulation of the space debris population which cannot be captured with standard Monte Carlo statistics. The objective of this paper is to present and discuss many of the uncertainty sources affecting the long-term predictions done with evolutionary models, in order to serve as a roadmap for the uncertainty and the statistical robustness analysis of the long-term evolution of the space debris population.

[1]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  The New Space Debris Mitigation (SDM 4.0) Long Term Evolution Code , 2009 .

[2]  J.-C. Liou A statistical analysis of the future debris environment , 2008 .

[3]  J. Liou An active debris removal parametric study for LEO environment remediation , 2011 .

[4]  H. Klinkrad,et al.  The sensitivity of the ESA DELTA model , 2002 .

[5]  J. Liou Collision activities in the future orbital debris environment , 2004 .

[6]  H. Sdunnus,et al.  An Introduction to the 1997 ESA Master Model , 1997 .

[7]  Bruno Revelin,et al.  Introducing MEDEE- A New Orbital Debris Evolutionary Model , 2013 .

[8]  S. Alfano,et al.  Satellite Conjunction Monte Carlo Analysis , 2009 .

[9]  G. Swinerd,et al.  Response of the Space Debris Environment to Greenhouse Cooling , 2005 .

[10]  Luciano Anselmo,et al.  EVOLUTION OF THE DEBRIS CLOUD GENERATED BY THE FENGYUN-1C FRAGMENTATION EVENT , 2007 .

[12]  N. Johnson,et al.  NASA's new breakup model of evolve 4.0 , 2001 .

[13]  Darren McKnight,et al.  Refined algorithms for structural breakup due to hypervelocity impact , 1995 .

[14]  H. Klinkrad Space Debris: Models and Risk Analysis , 2006 .

[15]  P. Farinella,et al.  Modelling the evolution of the space debris population , 1998 .

[16]  P. Krisko,et al.  LEGEND - a three-dimensional LEO-to-GEO debris evolutionary model , 2004 .

[17]  Florent Deleflie,et al.  Dynamical properties of Geostationary Transfer Orbits over long time scales: consequences for mission analysis and lifetime estimation , 2012 .

[18]  H. Rishbeth,et al.  Cooling of the upper atmosphere by enhanced greenhouse gases — modelling of thermospheric and ionospheric effects , 1992 .

[19]  R. Patera General Method for Calculating Satellite Collision Probability , 2001 .

[20]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  Updated results on the long-term evolution of the space debris environment , 1999 .

[21]  H. Klinkrad,et al.  Analysis of the effectiveness of space debris mitigation measures using the delta model , 2001 .

[22]  H. Sdunnus,et al.  Reliability of space debris modeling and the impact on current and future space flight activities , 1993 .

[23]  Florent Deleflie,et al.  Compliance of disposal orbits with the French Space Operations Act: The Good Practices and the STELA tool , 2014 .

[24]  Holger Krag,et al.  Global Trends in Achieving Successful End-Of-Life Disposal in LEO and GEO , 2014 .

[25]  Alain Lamy,et al.  Analysis of geostationary transfer orbit long term evolution and lifetime , 2012 .

[26]  Sonja J. Vermeulen,et al.  Climate change, food security and small-scale producers: Analysis of findings of the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2014 .

[27]  Luciano Anselmo,et al.  Review of past on-orbit collisions among cataloged objects and examination of the catastrophic fragmentation concept☆ , 2014 .

[28]  D. Kessler,et al.  Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt , 1978 .