Nature of shocks revealed by SOFIA OI observations in the Cepheus E protostellar outflow

Context. Protostellar jets and outflows are key features of the star-formation process, and primary processes of the feedback of young stars on the interstellar medium. Understanding the underlying shocks is necessary to explain how jet and outflow systems are launched, and to quantify their chemical and energetic impacts on the surrounding medium. Aims. We performed a high-spectral resolution study of the [OI]_(63μm) emission in the outflow of the intermediate-mass Class 0 protostar Cep E-mm. The goal is to determine the structure of the outflow, to constrain the chemical conditions in the various components, and to understand the nature of the underlying shocks, thus probing the origin of the mass-loss phenomenon. Methods. We present observations of the O I ^3P_1 → ^3P_2, OH between ^2Π_(1/2)J = 3/2 and J = 1/2 at 1837.8 GHz, and CO (16–15) lines with the GREAT receiver onboard SOFIA towards three positions in the Cep E protostellar outflow: Cep E-mm (the driving protostar), Cep E-BI (in the southern lobe), and Cep E-BII (the terminal position in the southern lobe). Results. The CO (16–15) line is detected at all three positions. The [OI]_(63μm) line is detected in Cep E-BI and BII, whereas the OH line is not detected. In Cep E-BII, we identify three kinematical components in O I and CO. These were already detected in CO transitions and relate to spatial components: the jet, the HH377 terminal bow-shock, and the outflow cavity. We measure line temperature and line integrated intensity ratios for all components. The O I column density is higher in the outflow cavity than in the jet, which itself is higher than in the terminal shock. The terminal shock is the region where the abundance ratio of O I to CO is the lowest (about 0.2), whereas the jet component is atomic (N(O I)/N(CO) ~ 2.7). In the jet, we compare the [OI]_(63μm) observations with shock models that successfully fit the integrated intensity of 10 CO lines. We find that these models most likely do not fit the [OI]_(63μm) data. Conclusions. The high intensity of O I emission points towards the propagation of additional dissociative or alternative FUV-irradiated shocks, where the illumination comes from the shock itself. A picture emerges from the sample of low-to-high mass protostellar outflows, where similar observations have been performed, with the effects of illumination increasing with the mass of the protostar. These findings need confirmation with more observational constraints and a larger sample.

[1]  A. Gusdorf,et al.  Oxygen budget in low-mass protostars: the NGC 1333-IRAS4A R1 shock observed in [O i] at 63 μm with SOFIA-GREAT , 2017, 1704.07593.

[2]  A. Gusdorf,et al.  The shocked gas of the BHR71 outflow observed by Herschel: indirect evidence for an atomic jet , 2017, 1701.04243.

[3]  G. P. Forêts,et al.  Interpreting observations of molecular outflow sources: the MHD shock code mhd_vode , 2015 .

[4]  M. Kaufman,et al.  O2 EMISSION TOWARD ORION H2 PEAK 1 AND THE ROLE OF FUV-ILLUMINATED C-SHOCKS , 2015, 1505.03909.

[5]  G. Herczeg,et al.  [O I] 63 μm JETS IN CLASS 0 SOURCES DETECTED BY HERSCHEL , 2015, 1501.03681.

[6]  Urs U. Graf,et al.  4.7-THz Superconducting Hot Electron Bolometer Waveguide Mixer , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology.

[7]  A. Benz,et al.  Observational evidence for dissociative shocks in the inner 100 AU of low-mass protostars using Herschel-HIFI , 2013, 1307.1710.

[8]  U. U. Graf,et al.  GREAT: the SOFIA high-frequency heterodyne instrument , 2012, 1203.2845.

[9]  A. Gusdorf,et al.  High-J CO emission in the Cepheus E protostellar outflow observed with SOFIA/GREAT , 2012, 1203.1890.

[10]  Y. Okada,et al.  GREAT/SOFIA atmospheric calibration , 2012, 1203.1661.

[11]  D. Hollenbach,et al.  WATER, O2, AND ICE IN MOLECULAR CLOUDS , 2008, 0809.1642.

[12]  R. Bachiller,et al.  Chemically active outflow L 1157 , 2001 .

[13]  B. Reipurth,et al.  Mm/Submm images of Herbig-Haro energy sources and candidate protostars , 2001 .

[14]  A. Boss,et al.  Protostars and Planets , 1998, Science.

[15]  L. Hartmann,et al.  Disk Accretion Rates for T Tauri Stars , 1998 .

[16]  F. Bertoldi,et al.  Structure of Stationary Photodissociation Fronts , 1996, astro-ph/9603032.

[17]  D. Hollenbach,et al.  Molecule Formation and Infrared Emission in Fast Interstellar Shocks. III. Results for J Shocks in Molecular Clouds , 1989 .

[18]  B. Shustov Protostars and Planets II , 1987 .

[19]  B. Draine Photoelectric heating of interstellar gas , 1978 .

[20]  A. Sargent Molecular clouds and star formation. I. Observations of the Cepheus OB3 molecular cloud. , 1977 .