Effect of a finite-size pinhole on noise performance in single-, two-, and three-photon confocal fluorescence microscopy.

It is known that signal level in single-, two- and three-photon confocal fluorescence microscopy increases with the size of the detector. Here we evaluate the signal-to-noise and the signal-to-background criteria for these microscopes. We investigate the effect of pinhole size on their ability to detect a weakly fluorescent point object in the presence of a uniformly fluorescence background. Numerical results based on a paraxial approximation theory show that optimization of these criteria gives an optimal value for pinhole size, which results in an improved imaging performance. The resulting improvement in noise performance, compared with the use of a large detector, is greater for three-photon than for two-photon confocal fluorescence microscopes.

[1]  W. Denk,et al.  Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Science.

[2]  Tony Wilson,et al.  Three‐dimensional imaging in confocal imaging systems with finite sized detectors , 1988 .

[3]  A. Brown,et al.  Optical microscopy for biology : Edited by Brian Herman and Ken Jacobson; Wiley-Liss; New York, 1990; xviii + 658 pages; $95.00 , 1991 .

[4]  M. Gu,et al.  Principles Of Three-Dimensional Imaging In Confocal Microscopes , 1996 .

[5]  C. Sheppard.  Image formation in three‐photon fluorescence microscopy , 1996 .

[6]  W. Webb,et al.  Background rejection and signal-to-noise optimization in confocal and alternative fluorescence microscopes. , 1994, Applied optics.

[7]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Confocal fluorescent microscopy with a finite-sized circular detector , 1992 .

[8]  Carol J. Cogswell,et al.  Signal Strength and Noise in Confocal Microscopy: Factors Influencing Selection of an Optimum Detector Aperture , 1991 .

[9]  K Bahlmann,et al.  Three-photon excitation in fluorescence microscopy. , 1996, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Theory and practice of scanning optical microscopy , 1984 .

[11]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Effects of a Finite-sized Pinhole on 3D Image Formation in Confocal Two-photon Fluorescence Microscopy , 1993 .

[12]  W. Webb,et al.  Quantitative comparison of background rejection, signal-to-noise ratio, and resolution in confocal and full-field laser scanning microscopes. , 1995, Applied optics.

[13]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[14]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Three-dimensional confocal fluorescence imaging under ultrashort pulse illumination , 1995 .

[15]  David R. Sandison,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – Background Rejection and Optimization of Signal to Noise in Confocal Microscopy , 1994 .

[16]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Detectability: A New Criterion for Evaluation of the Confocal Microscope , 1993 .

[17]  C. J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Effects of a finite-sized detector on the OTF of confocal fluorescent microscopy , 1991 .

[18]  R Kompfner,et al.  Resonant scanning optical microscope. , 1978, Applied optics.