Tree‐Chromatic Number Is Not Equal to Path‐Chromatic Number*

For a graph $G$ and a tree-decomposition $(T, \mathcal{B})$ of $G$, the chromatic number of $(T, \mathcal{B})$ is the maximum of $\chi(G[B])$, taken over all bags $B \in \mathcal{B}$. The tree-chromatic number of $G$ is the minimum chromatic number of all tree-decompositions $(T, \mathcal{B})$ of $G$. The path-chromatic number of $G$ is defined analogously. In this paper, we introduce an operation that always increases the path-chromatic number of a graph. As an easy corollary of our construction, we obtain an infinite family of graphs whose path-chromatic number and tree-chromatic number are different. This settles a question of Seymour. Our results also imply that the path-chromatic numbers of the Mycielski graphs are unbounded.

[1]  Yngve Villanger,et al.  Computing Pathwidth Faster Than 2n , 2009, IWPEC.

[2]  Paul D. Seymour,et al.  Tree-chromatic number , 2016, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[3]  Jan Mycielski Sur le coloriage des graphs , 1955 .