Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study.

PURPOSE Single-agent gemcitabine became standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after demonstration of superiority compared with fluorouracil. The Gruppo Italiano Pancreas 1 randomized phase III trial aimed to compare gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00813696). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 50, were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (arm A) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B). Arm A: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 7 weeks, and, after a 1-week rest, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Arm B: cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) added weekly to gemcitabine, except cycle 1 day 22. Primary end point was overall survival. To have 8% power of detecting a 0.74 hazard ratio (HR) of death, with bilateral alpha .05, 355 events were needed and 400 patients planned. RESULTS Four hundred patients were enrolled (arm A: 199; arm B: 201). Median age was 63, 59% were male, 84% had stage IV, and 83% had KPS > or = 80. Median overall survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.35; P = .38). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months versus 3.8 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.19; P = .80). The objective response rate was 10.1% in A and 12.9% in B (P = .37). Clinical benefit was experienced by 23.0% in A and 15.1% in B (P = .057). Combination therapy produced more hematologic toxicity, without relevant differences in nonhematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION The addition of weekly cisplatin to gemcitabine failed to demonstrate any improvement as first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

[1]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Labianca,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[3]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials Comparing Gemcitabine-Based Doublets versus Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer , 2007, Drugs & aging.

[4]  R. Labianca,et al.  Increased survival using platinum analog combined with gemcitabine as compared to single-agent gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: pooled analysis of two randomized trials, the GERCOR/GISCAD intergroup study and a German multicenter study. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  M. Pino,et al.  Gemcitabine‐based combinations for inoperable pancreatic cancer: Have we made real progress? , 2007, Cancer.

[6]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  P. Murawa,et al.  Erlotinib Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group , 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  H. Einsele,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Berlin,et al.  Phase III trial of gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose-rate infusion [FDR]) versus gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201). , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Labianca,et al.  Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Ychou,et al.  Gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin (GP) versus gemcitabine (G) alone in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: Final results of a multicenter randomized phase II study. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  G. Colucci,et al.  Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[13]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[14]  G. Peters,et al.  Basis for effective combination cancer chemotherapy with antimetabolites. , 2000, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[15]  H. Jiang,et al.  Expression of ERCC1 antisense RNA abrogates gemicitabine-mediated cytotoxic synergism with cisplatin in human colon tumor cells defective in mismatch repair but proficient in nucleotide excision repair. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[16]  G. Peters,et al.  Mechanisms of synergism between cisplatin and gemcitabine in ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  H. Friess,et al.  Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[18]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M Schemper,et al.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[20]  G. Peters,et al.  Synergistic interaction between cisplatin and gemcitabine in vitro. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[21]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[23]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[24]  N. Mantel Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[25]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[26]  L. Jian-hua,et al.  Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer , 2010 .

[27]  Andrew Bottomley,et al.  EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual , 1995 .

[28]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .