A Case for PARAM Shavak: Ready-to-Use and Affordable Supercomputing Solution

High Performance Computing (HPC) Systems are usually large systems which require specialized infrastructure. For a variety of small time users, who need performance of the parallel computing for their applications, such systems are unaffordable and inaccessible for a number of reasons. Even to setup a small state-of-the-art HPC system, such users would require vast efforts and expertise to design system specifications and to identify and install system software, tools and user applications. Also, going through such process would consume time and can be expensive. Clearly, there is a requirement of a small and low-cost ready-to- use HPC system which can be straightway put to utilization by end-users. In this paper, we present a case of a small, affordable and personalized supercomputing solution named PARAM Shavak [8, 9] which offers ready-to-use supercomputing-in-a-box solution based on commercial off-the-shelf HPC hardware resources. This solution is aimed as a support tool for research, design and development — often related to the education or small time designers. The solution is so architected that it provides scalability and power efficiency. We also discuss the uniqueness of our solution compared to several related initiatives which have been around and show its efficacy.

[1]  Francisco J. Cazorla,et al.  A dynamic scheduler for balancing HPC applications , 2008, 2008 SC - International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[2]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[3]  Alejandro Duran,et al.  The Design of OpenMP Tasks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[4]  Franck Cappello,et al.  HPCS 2013 panel: The era of exascale sciences: Challenges, needs and requirements , 2013, HPCS.

[5]  V. Kumar,et al.  Job Scheduling in the presence of Multiple Resource Requirements , 1999, ACM/IEEE SC 1999 Conference (SC'99).

[6]  Lachlan L. H. Andrew,et al.  Exploiting per user information for supercomputing workload prediction requires care , 2013, 2013 13th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing.

[7]  Ewing L. Lusk MPI in 2002: has it been ten years already? , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[8]  Nisha Kurkure,et al.  ONAMA: A Quantum Leap in High Performance Computing , 2011 .

[9]  K. Kennedy,et al.  Evaluation of a Workflow Scheduler Using Integrated Performance Modelling and Batch Queue Wait Time Prediction , 2006, ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06).

[10]  Dale Sartor,et al.  Money for Research, Not Energy Bills: Finding Energy and Cost Savings in High-Performance Computer Facility Designs , 2010, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[11]  Theodora A. Varvarigou,et al.  Building a virtual cluster using HPC-Europa2 live DVD , 2012, 2012 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS).