Prey-catching and predator avoidance 2: modeling the medullary hemifield deficit
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Ingle,et al. Visuomotor functions of the frog optic tectum. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.
[2] D. Ingle. 4 – Spatial Vision in Anurans , 1976 .
[3] D. Ingle. Behavioral Correlates of Central Visual Function in Anurans , 1976 .
[4] J. Ewert. 5 – The Visual System of the Toad: Behavioral and Physiological Studies on a Pattern Recognition System , 1976 .
[5] D. Ingle. Detection of stationary objects by frogs (Rana pipiens) after ablation of optic tectum. , 1977, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[6] Paul Grobstein,et al. Visual orienting deficits in frogs with various unilateral lesions , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.
[7] D. Ingle. Brain Mechanisms of Visual Localization by Frogs and Toads , 1983 .
[8] H. Vanegas,et al. Comparative neurology of the optic tectum , 1984 .
[9] J. Ewert. Tectal Mechanisms That Underlie Prey-Catching and Avoidance Behaviors in Toads , 1984 .
[10] R Lara,et al. A global model of the neural mechanisms responsible for visuomotor coordination in toads. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.
[11] P. Grobstein,et al. Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog—I. Effects of various unilateral lesions , 1987, Neuroscience.
[12] P. Grobstein. Between the retinotectal projection and directed movement: topography of a sensorimotor interface. , 1988, Brain, behavior and evolution.
[13] D. Ingle,et al. Visually Elicited Evasive Behavior in FrogsGiving memory research an ethological context , 1990 .
[14] Michael A. Arbib,et al. Depth and detours: an essay on visually guided behavior , 1990 .