Quantitative evaluation of local head malformations from 3 dimensional photography: application to craniosynostosis

The evaluation of head malformations plays an essential role in the early diagnosis, the decision to perform surgery and the assessment of the surgical outcome of patients with craniosynostosis. Clinicians rely on two metrics to evaluate the head shape: head circumference (HC) and cephalic index (CI). However, they present a high inter-observer variability and they do not take into account the location of the head abnormalities. In this study, we present an automated framework to objectively quantify the head malformations, HC, and CI from three-dimensional (3D) photography, a radiation-free, fast and non-invasive imaging modality. Our method automatically extracts the head shape using a set of landmarks identified by registering the head surface of a patient to a reference template in which the position of the landmarks is known. Then, we quantify head malformations as the local distances between the patient’s head and its closest normal from a normative statistical head shape multi-atlas. We calculated cranial malformations, HC, and CI for 28 patients with craniosynostosis, and we compared them with those computed from the normative population. Malformation differences between the two populations were statistically significant (p<0.05) at the head regions with abnormal development due to suture fusion. We also trained a support vector machine classifier using the malformations calculated and we obtained an improved accuracy of 91.03% in the detection of craniosynostosis, compared to 78.21% obtained with HC or CI. This method has the potential to assist in the longitudinal evaluation of cranial malformations after surgical treatment of craniosynostosis.

[1]  G. Lüchters,et al.  Head circumference - a useful single parameter for skull volume development in cranial growth analysis? , 2018, Head & Face Medicine.

[2]  Shumei S. Guo,et al.  CDC GROWTH CHARTS FOR THE UNITED STATES: METHODS AND DEVELOPMENT 2000 , 2002 .

[3]  Andinet Enquobahrie,et al.  Locally Affine Diffeomorphic Surface Registration and Its Application to Surgical Planning of Fronto-Orbital Advancement , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  S. Bergé,et al.  A new method for three-dimensional evaluation of the cranial shape and the automatic identification of craniosynostosis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. , 2017, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  Walter Huda,et al.  Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography , 2007, Pediatrics.

[6]  Paul A. Pope,et al.  SHRINKWRAP: 3D MODEL ABSTRACTION FOR REMOTE SENSING SIMULATION , 2009 .

[7]  Sheila Weinmann,et al.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[8]  Andinet Enquobahrie,et al.  Personalized Optimal Planning for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis , 2016, CLIP@MICCAI.

[9]  Beatriz Paniagua,et al.  3D of brain shape and volume after cranial vault remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis correction in infants , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Shumei S. Guo,et al.  2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. , 2002, Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey.

[11]  A. Hockley,et al.  Craniosynostosis , 1993, The Lancet.

[12]  Carlos S. Mendoza,et al.  Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  C. Raffel,et al.  Surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: outcome analysis of 250 consecutive patients. , 1997, Pediatrics.

[14]  E. Wikberg,et al.  Comparison of Intracranial Volume and Cephalic Index After Correction of Sagittal Synostosis With Spring-assisted Surgery or Pi-plasty , 2016, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[15]  J. D. de Rooi,et al.  Volume measurements on three-dimensional photogrammetry after extended strip versus total cranial remodeling for sagittal synostosis: A comparative cohort study. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[16]  Natasha Lepore,et al.  Radiation-free quantification of head malformations in craniosynostosis patients from 3D photography , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[17]  C. Bonaïti‐pellié,et al.  Genetic study of nonsyndromic coronal craniosynostosis. , 1995, American journal of medical genetics.

[18]  H. Schaaf,et al.  Accuracy of Photographic Assessment Compared with Standard Anthropometric Measurements in Nonsynostotic Cranial Deformities , 2010, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.