A genetic algorithm based framework to model the relationship between building renovation decisions and occupants’ satisfaction with indoor environmental quality

Abstract Providing comfortable indoor environmental conditions that please the majority of building occupants is an essential goal of facility management. The relationship between occupants' level of satisfaction with indoor environment conditions and their productivity at the workplace is well proven; however, the relationship between building renovation decisions and occupants’ level of satisfaction with indoor environmental quality (IEQ) is under-studied. To address this gap, this paper explores the relationship between these two factors. The work entails developing a genetic algorithm (GA) based framework to model the relationship between potential building retrofit options and improvement in IEQ conditions and associated level of productive time of building occupants. The framework takes into consideration the fluctuations in IEQ perception among different occupant groups and the corresponding levels of satisfaction. Subgroups of employees are classified based on three main parameters: gender, type of office, and distance to the nearest window. Based on these parameters, the increase in the level of satisfaction of building occupants, and consequently their productivity, as a result of building renovation are calculated and fed into a GA based decision making tool. The proposed generic framework and tool are tested on a real-world case study yielding optimal building retrofit options in light of several user-defined constraints such as available budget and market conditions.

[1]  N. Vohra,et al.  Prior Related Work Experience and Job Performance: Role of Personality , 2014 .

[2]  P. Fanger,et al.  The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. , 2000, Indoor air.

[3]  Johnny Wong,et al.  Toward low-carbon construction processes: the visualisation of predicted emission via virtual prototyping technology , 2013 .

[4]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction , 2012 .

[5]  George Havenith,et al.  Environmental and human factors influencing thermal comfort of office occupants in hot—humid and hot—arid climates , 2003, Ergonomics.

[6]  Edward Arens,et al.  Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) , 2013 .

[7]  John Vasselli,et al.  Impact of VOCs on decision making and productivity , 2013 .

[8]  Zhiwei Lian,et al.  Use of neurobehavioral tests to evaluate the effects of indoor environment quality on productivity , 2009 .

[9]  Li Lan,et al.  Neurobehavioral approach for evaluation of office workers' productivity : The effects of room temperature , 2009 .

[10]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Estimates of Improved Productivity and Health from Better Indoor Environments , 1997 .

[11]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Comfort metrics for an integrated evaluation of buildings performance , 2016 .

[12]  Denise A. Guerin,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality Related to Occupant Satisfaction and Performance in LEED-certified Buildings , 2009 .

[13]  Erkki Kähkönen,et al.  Psychosocial dimensions of solving an indoor air problem. , 2002, Indoor air.

[14]  Issam Srour,et al.  Testing the correlation between indoor environmental quality and productive time , 2015 .

[15]  Li Lan,et al.  The effects of air temperature on office workers' well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  E. Abt.  Understanding statistics 3 , 2010, Evidence-Based Dentistry.

[17]  Theresa J. B. Kline,et al.  Traditional versus Open Office Design , 2002 .

[18]  Dainius Martuzevicius,et al.  Assessment of indoor environmental quality in existing multi-family buildings in North-East Europe. , 2015, Environment international.

[19]  David Lehrer,et al.  Listening to the occupants: a Web-based indoor environmental quality survey. , 2004, Indoor air.

[20]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variables , 1999 .

[21]  Thad Godish,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality , 2000 .

[22]  Joon-Ho Choi,et al.  Impacts of human and spatial factors on user satisfaction in office environments , 2017 .

[23]  Sang Hoon Lee,et al.  Commercial Building Energy Saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit , 2015 .

[24]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[25]  William W. Braham,et al.  An integrated energy–emergy approach to building form optimization: Use of EnergyPlus, emergy analysis and Taguchi-regression method , 2015 .

[26]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  Minimizing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Construction Activities and Processes , 2012 .

[27]  Johnny N. Holst,et al.  USING WHOLE BUILDING SIMULATION MODELS AND OPTIMIZING PROCEDURES TO OPTIMIZE BUILDING ENVELOPE DESIGN WITH RESPECT TO ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENT. , 2003 .

[28]  W. Fisk.  HEALTH AND PRODUCTIVITY GAINS FROM BETTER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY , 2000 .

[29]  Ralph Evins,et al.  A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design , 2013 .

[30]  Denise A. Guerin,et al.  Occupants’ satisfaction with, and physical readings of, thermal, acoustic, and lighting conditions of sustainable office workspaces , 2015 .

[31]  Lingfeng Wang,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for decision-making of energy and comfort management in building automation and control , 2012 .

[32]  John G. Bartzis,et al.  Perceived Indoor Environment and Occupants’ Comfort in European “Modern” Office Buildings: The OFFICAIR Study , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[33]  M Frontczak,et al.  Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. , 2012, Indoor air.