Quantitative CRISPR interference screens in yeast identify chemical-genetic interactions and new rules for guide RNA design

BackgroundGenome-scale CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) has been used in human cell lines; however, the features of effective guide RNAs (gRNAs) in different organisms have not been well characterized. Here, we define rules that determine gRNA effectiveness for transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.ResultsWe create an inducible single plasmid CRISPRi system for gene repression in yeast, and use it to analyze fitness effects of gRNAs under 18 small molecule treatments. Our approach correctly identifies previously described chemical-genetic interactions, as well as a new mechanism of suppressing fluconazole toxicity by repression of the ERG25 gene. Assessment of multiple target loci across treatments using gRNA libraries allows us to determine generalizable features associated with gRNA efficacy. Guides that target regions with low nucleosome occupancy and high chromatin accessibility are clearly more effective. We also find that the best region to target gRNAs is between the transcription start site (TSS) and 200 bp upstream of the TSS. Finally, unlike nuclease-proficient Cas9 in human cells, the specificity of truncated gRNAs (18 nt of complementarity to the target) is not clearly superior to full-length gRNAs (20 nt of complementarity), as truncated gRNAs are generally less potent against both mismatched and perfectly matched targets.ConclusionsOur results establish a powerful functional and chemical genomics screening method and provide guidelines for designing effective gRNAs, which consider chromatin state and position relative to the target gene TSS. These findings will enable effective library design and genome-wide programmable gene repression in many genetic backgrounds.

[1]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Juan M. Vaquerizas,et al.  Comprehensive reanalysis of transcription factor knockout expression data in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals many new targets , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation , 2014, Cell.

[4]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.

[5]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[6]  Yilong Li,et al.  Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2013, Science.

[8]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  CRISPR-Mediated Modular RNA-Guided Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes , 2013, Cell.

[9]  G. Giaever,et al.  Quantitative Phenotyping via Deep Barcode Sequencing , 2022 .

[10]  D. Kelly,et al.  Mode of Action and Resistance to Azole Antifungals Associated with the Formation of 14α-Methylergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3β,6α-diol , 1995 .

[11]  S Rozen,et al.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  G. Giaever,et al.  Yeast Barcoders: a chemogenomic application of a universal donor-strain collection carrying bar-code identifiers , 2008, Nature Methods.

[13]  Meilin Zhu,et al.  "RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas 9" (2013), by Prashant Mali, Luhan Yang, Kevin M. Esvelt, John Aach, Marc Guell, James E. DiCarlo, Julie E. Norville, and George M. Church , 2017 .

[14]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[15]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of Cas9 Endonucleases Reveal RNA-Mediated Conformational Activation , 2014, Science.

[16]  Robert P. St.Onge,et al.  Highly-multiplexed barcode sequencing: an efficient method for parallel analysis of pooled samples , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  G. Church,et al.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Robert P. St.Onge,et al.  Multiplex assay for condition-dependent changes in protein–protein interactions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome , 2008, Nature Methods.

[20]  Huiming Ding,et al.  The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[21]  T. Lu,et al.  Tunable and Multifunctional Eukaryotic Transcription Factors Based on CRISPR/Cas , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[22]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  ViennaRNA Package 2.0 , 2011, Algorithms for Molecular Biology.

[23]  F. Winston,et al.  Chromatin and Transcription in Yeast , 2012, Genetics.

[24]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Resource Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013 .

[26]  Alexandro E. Trevino,et al.  Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex , 2014, Nature.

[27]  Chao Zhang,et al.  An integrated platform of genomic assays reveals small-molecule bioactivities. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[28]  Younghoon Lee,et al.  On-off controllable RNA hybrid expression vector for yeast three-hybrid system. , 2010, BMB reports.

[29]  Frederick S. Vizeacoumar,et al.  Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  Mapping the Cellular Response to Small Molecules Using Chemogenomic Fitness Signatures , 2014, Science.

[31]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells , 2014, Science.

[33]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR , 2013, Bioinform..

[34]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[35]  A. Fire,et al.  Landscape of target:guide homology effects on Cas9-mediated cleavage , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[38]  George M. Church,et al.  Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[40]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Christopher M. Vockley,et al.  RNA-guided gene activation by CRISPR-Cas9-based transcription factors , 2013, Nature Methods.

[42]  F. Dietrich,et al.  Mapping of transcription start sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 5′ SAGE , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  D. Engelke,et al.  Expression of RNase P RNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by an unusual RNA polymerase III promoter. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[45]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[46]  M. Boutros,et al.  E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification , 2014, Nature Methods.

[47]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Structured nucleosome fingerprints enable high-resolution mapping of chromatin architecture within regulatory regions , 2015, bioRxiv.

[48]  Morgan L. Maeder,et al.  CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes , 2013, Nature Methods.

[49]  Judith B. Zaugg,et al.  A genomic model of condition-specific nucleosome behavior explains transcriptional activity in yeast. , 2012, Genome research.

[50]  Shiyou Zhu,et al.  High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells , 2014, Nature.

[51]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Genome-wide views of chromatin structure. , 2009, Annual review of biochemistry.

[52]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[53]  J. Folch,et al.  A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. , 1957, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[54]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Identification of drug targets by chemogenomic and metabolomic profiling in yeast , 2012, Pharmacogenetics and genomics.

[55]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[56]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[57]  S. Kelly,et al.  Azole Resistance by Loss of Function of the Sterol Δ5,6-Desaturase Gene (ERG3) in Candida albicans Does Not Necessarily Decrease Virulence , 2012, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[58]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  Extensive transcriptional heterogeneity revealed by isoform profiling , 2013, Nature.

[59]  D. Kelly,et al.  Mode of action and resistance to azole antifungals associated with the formation of 14 alpha-methylergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3 beta,6 alpha-diol. , 1995, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[60]  R. Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .