Farm-to-school programs’ local foods activity in Southern Arizona: Local foods toolkit applications and lessons

This analysis applies principles and methods from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Local Foods Toolkit to demonstrate the moderating influence of countervailing effects on the economic impacts of local food purchases through farm-to-school programs in Southern Arizona using USDA Farm to School Census data. The analysis applies and expands upon recommendations in the Toolkit, introducing the concept of export substitution and exploring how water resource constraints create tradeoffs for farms through crop-shifting and cropping rotations. The analysis reveals that for fruit and vegetable exporting regions, export substitution can be a major countervailing effect. Furthermore, the analysis examines the usefulness of the Farm to School Census as a secondary data source for estimating the economic impacts of local food activities, allowing us to make recommendations for how the Census could be expanded and supplemented for regional economic applications.

[1]  G. Frisvold,et al.  Evaluating Gravity-Flow Irrigation with Lessons from Yuma, Arizona, USA , 2018 .

[2]  B. Jablonski,et al.  The Financial Performance Implications of Differential Marketing Strategies: Exploring Farms that Pursue Local Markets as a Core Competitive Advantage , 2018, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[3]  D. McFadden,et al.  Exploring Localized Economic Dynamics: Methods-Driven Case Studies of Transformation and Growth in Agricultural and Food Markets , 2017 .

[4]  Megan Phillips Goldenberg,et al.  Tracking the impacts of farm-to-school purchasing programs. , 2017 .

[5]  J. Kolodinsky,et al.  Do Farm-to-School Programs Create Local Economic Impacts? , 2017 .

[6]  B. Rogers,et al.  Price Differences across Farmers’ Markets, Roadside Stands, and Supermarkets in North Carolina , 2016 .

[7]  Megan Phillips Goldenberg,et al.  The Economics of Local Food Systems: A Toolkit to Guide Community Discussions, Assessments and Choices. , 2016 .

[8]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  Input–Output Analysis , 2011 .

[9]  R. Pesch.  Assessing the Potential Farm-to-Institution Market in Central and Northeast Minnesota: An Analysis of the Market Potential of Locally Raised Foods by Educational and Healthcare Institutions in 12 Central and Northeast Minnesota Counties , 2014 .

[10]  D. Swenson.  The Economic Contribution Potential of Local Foods Production in Kane County, Illinois , 2013 .

[11]  Brett E. Fleck.  Factors Affecting Agricultural Water Use and Sourcing in Irrigation Districts of Central Arizona , 2013 .

[12]  Curtis R. Price,et al.  Consumer Preference for Locally Grown Produce: An Analysis of Willingness-To-Pay and Geographic Scale , 2011 .

[13]  S. Vogel,et al.  Direct and Intermediated Marketing of Local Foods in the United States , 2011 .

[14]  Allison Gunter.  Rebuilding local food systems: Marketing and economic implications for communities , 2011 .

[15]  Brigid Tuck,et al.  The Economic Impact of Farm-to-School Lunch Programs: A Central Minnesota Example , 2010 .

[16]  D. Swenson.  Selected Measures of the Economic Values of Increased Fruit and Vegetable Production and Consumption in the Upper Midwest , 2010 .

[17]  M. Haynes.  Farm-to-School in Central Minnesota - Applied Economic Analysis , 2010 .

[18]  G. Nurse,et al.  Local Food Consumers: How Motivations and Perceptions Translate to Buying Behavior , 2010 .

[19]  John J. Siegfried,et al.  The Economic Impact of Colleges and Universities , 2007 .

[20]  K. Jacobs,et al.  Managing for sustainability in an arid climate: lessons learned from 20 years of groundwater management in Arizona, USA , 2004 .

[21]  M. Weinberg.  Federal Water Policy Reform: Implications for Irrigated Farms in California , 1997 .

[22]  A. Dinar,et al.  Water and Land as Quantity-Rationed Inputs in California Agriculture: Empirical Tests and Water Policy Implications , 1995 .

[23]  Mark T. Kanazawa.  Pricing Subsidies and Economic Efficiency: The U. S. Bureau of Reclamation , 1993, The Journal of Law and Economics.