Dynamic Characteristics of Granite Subjected to Intermediate Loading Rate

SummaryA large diameter split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) has been developed. This equipment is briefly described, together with a shaped striker that initiates a half-sine incident waveform to obtain the complete stress-strain relationship of the Bukit Timah granite at medium strain rate. Good constant strain rate was derived, and the dynamic complete stress-strain curves and energy absorption of the granite were measured at a strain rate between 20 and 60 per second. Repeated impact between 60–90% of the static strength of the granite was also conducted. Results from the tests show that the cumulative damage of the granite depends on the peak stress of the dynamic loads with a fixed duration. The dynamic fracture strength of the granite loaded at medium strain rate is directly proportional to the cube root of the strain rate. For the granite loaded at this strain rate, Young’s modulus is unchanged. Energy absorption of the samples loading to fragmentation determined its fragmented size distribution. At high strain rate, the rock possesses large energy absorption and the particle size of the fragments is much smaller.

[1]  H. B. Li,et al.  Triaxial compression tests on a granite at different strain rates and confining pressures , 1999 .

[2]  J. Lankford TECHNICAL NOTE. THE ROLE OF TENSILE MICROFRACTURE IN THE STRAIN RATE DEPENDENCE OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF FINE-GRAINED LIMESTONE - ANALOGY WITH STRONG CERAMICS , 1981 .

[3]  S. J. Green,et al.  Uniaxial Compression Tests At Varying Strain Rates On Three Geologic Materials , 1968 .

[4]  Anand Kumar,et al.  The effect of stress rate and temperature on the strength of basalt and granite , 1968 .

[5]  M. E. Kipp,et al.  THE MICROMECHANICS OF IMPACT FRACTURE OF ROCK , 1979 .

[6]  Hitoshi Mizutani,et al.  Experimental study of strain-rate dependence and pressure dependence of failure properties of granite , 1987 .

[7]  J. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Data processing in the split Hopkinson pressure bar tests , 1994 .

[8]  J. Zhao,et al.  Hugoniot equation of state of the Bukit Timah granite , 2000 .

[9]  M. E. Kipp,et al.  Continuum modelling of explosive fracture in oil shale , 1980 .

[10]  Donald R. Curran,et al.  Fragmentation of rock under dynamic loads , 1974 .

[11]  W. Brace,et al.  Comparison of uniaxial deformation in shock and static loading of three rocks , 1971 .

[12]  L. E. Malvern,et al.  Dispersion Investigation in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1990 .

[13]  Xibing Li,et al.  Oscillation elimination in the Hopkinson bar apparatus and resultant complete dynamic stress-strain curves for rocks , 2000 .

[14]  P. S. Follansbee,et al.  Wave Propagation in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1983 .

[15]  Xibing Li,et al.  TESTING AND RESPONSE OF LARGE DIAMETER BRITTLE MATERIALS SUBJECTED TO HIGH STRAIN RATE , 2002 .

[16]  V. Choa,et al.  Underground cavern development in the Jurong sedimentary rock formation , 1999 .

[17]  Han Zhao,et al.  On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains , 1996 .

[18]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Construction and Utilization of Rock Caverns in Singapore Part A: The Bukit Timah Granite Bedrock Resource , 1996 .

[19]  Z. T. Bieniawski,et al.  Mechanism of brittle fracture of rockPart Itheory of the fracture process , 1967 .

[20]  D. L. Birkimer,et al.  Possible fracture criterion for the dynamic tensile strength of rock , 1970 .