Performance of booster seats in side impacts: effect of adjacent passengers and ISOfix attachment.

This study examined the performance of a booster seat in different seating configurations in side-impact hyGe sled tests (crash severity 30 km/h) with two attachment systems: a standard seatbelt and ISOfix (rigid). The objectives of the study were twofold: (i) to identify the relative benefits of ISOfix attachment compared with seatbelt attachment of a near-side booster seat in a 3-abreast seating configuration with adjacent occupants in child restraints (CRS); and (ii) to examine the effects of 3-abreast seating configurations compared with no adjacent passengers on booster seat crash protection characteristics. Overall, the findings confirmed the superior performance of the rigid anchorages in reducing lateral motion of the booster as well as the two adjacent CRS. However, the expected benefits of the rigid attachment in reducing head accelerations were not uniformly observed across the three occupants/seating positions and also appeared to be influenced by seating configuration (3-abreast versus no adjacent occupant). Further research is warranted to explore the applicability of the findings for different CRS types and seating configurations.

[1]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Effect of increased rear row occupancy on injury to seat belt restrained children in side impact crashes. , 2005, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[2]  Julie Brown,et al.  Improved Protection for Children in Forward-Facing Restraints During Side Impacts , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[3]  Flaura Koplin Winston,et al.  Injury Risks for Children in Child Restraint Systems in Side Impact Crashes , 2004 .

[4]  M Henderson,et al.  CHILDREN IN CAR CRASHES: AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF CAR CRASHES IN WHICH CHILD OCCUPANTS WERE INJURED , 1994 .

[5]  D Winn,et al.  Injuries among 4- to 9-year-old restrained motor vehicle occupants by seat location and crash impact site. , 1989, American journal of diseases of children.

[6]  Brian Fildes,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of child restraints and anchorage systems for an Australian car. , 2004, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[7]  Andrew Howard,et al.  Children in side-impact motor vehicle crashes: seating positions and injury mechanisms. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  Ulric J Lund The effect of seating location on the injury of properly restrained children in child safety seats. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  D. Bulas,et al.  Patterns of injury to restrained children in side impact motor vehicle crashes: the side impact syndrome. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Michael Fitzharris,et al.  Injuries to children in child restraints , 2003 .

[11]  Judith Lynne Charlton,et al.  Crash performance evaluation of booster seats for an Australian car , 2005 .

[12]  J Shield Seating positions and children's risk of dying in motor vehicle crashes , 1999, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[13]  B. T. Jolly,et al.  A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF PEDIATRIC INJURY PATTERNS FROM THE NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE SAMPLING SYSTEM , 1998 .