Racial differences in optic disc topography: baseline results from the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study.

OBJECTIVE To examine racial differences in optic disc topography among ocular hypertensive participants in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. METHODS Four hundred thirty-nine participants from 7 Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study centers who had good-quality baseline images obtained using a quantitative 3-dimensional confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany), were included in this study. The first 10 degrees- or 15 degrees-field of view mean topographic image acquired was included in all analyses. Differences in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph topographic optic disc parameter measurements by self-identified race were assessed using a mixed-effects linear model to control for confounders and for the use of both eyes in the model. RESULTS By self-attribution, 74 (17%) of the 439 participants were of African origin, 329 (75%) were white, 24 (5%) were Hispanic, and 12 (3%) were Native American, Native Alaskan, Asian, Pacific Islander, or unknown. The African American participants had statistically significantly (P<.001) larger mean (SD) optic disc areas than the other participants, 2.17 (0.41) mm(2) vs 1.87 (0.38) mm(2), respectively. African American participants had a larger cup area, cup volume, cup depth, neuroretinal rim area, rim volume, and smaller rim-optic disc area ratios than the other participants. No difference between African American and the other participants was found for cup shape and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. After controlling for optic disc area, none of the differences between African American and the other participants found in the univariate analysis remained statistically significant (P>.10). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated in a large cohort of subjects with ocular hypertension, that African Americans have significantly larger optic discs, optic cups, neuroretinal rims, and cup-disc ratios than other racial groups. Furthermore, this study found that differences in topographic optic disc parameters between African Americans with ocular hypertension and other racial groups are largely explained by the larger optic disc area in the African Americans. These results highlight the need to consider race and optic disc size when evaluating the appearance of the optic disc in glaucoma.

[1]  M F Armaly,et al.  Optic cup in normal and glaucomatous eyes. , 1970, Investigative ophthalmology.

[2]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[3]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Incidence estimates for lens changes, macular changes, open-angle glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  R. Beck,et al.  Is there a racial difference in physiologic cup size? , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[5]  A. Sommer,et al.  Race and primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  J. M. Miller,et al.  Optic disc rim area is related to disc size in normal subjects. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Jonas,et al.  Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  M. Wilson.  Glaucoma in blacks: where do we go from here? , 1989, JAMA.

[9]  R. Ritch,et al.  Racial differences in optic nerve head parameters. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Sommer,et al.  Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Jonas,et al.  Correlation of the optic disc size to glaucoma susceptibility. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[12]  A. Sommer,et al.  Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. , 1991, JAMA.

[13]  E. Higginbotham,et al.  Larger optic nerve heads have more nerve fibers in normal monkey eyes. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  J. Jonas,et al.  Human optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  A. Heijl,et al.  Optic disc diameter influences the ability to detect glaucomatous disc damage , 1993, Acta ophthalmologica.

[16]  M Schulzer,et al.  Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the heidelberg retina tomograph. , 1993, Journal of glaucoma.

[17]  P T de Jong,et al.  The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[18]  A. Sommer,et al.  Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  S. Ruben.  Estimation of optic disc size using indirect biomicroscopy. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  N. Swindale,et al.  Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to Detect Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss , 1995, Journal of glaucoma.

[22]  A. F. Spencer,et al.  Optic disc measurement: a comparison of indirect ophthalmoscopic methods. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  L Brigatti,et al.  Regional test-retest variability of confocal scanning laser tomography. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ophthalmoscopic measurement of the optic disc. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[25]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Ethnic Differences in Optic Nerve Head Topography , 1995, Journal of glaucoma.

[26]  J. Caprioli,et al.  Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  P A Sample,et al.  Optic nerve head topography in ocular hypertensive eyes using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[29]  D. Broadway,et al.  A Comparison of Healthy, Ocular Hypertensive, and Glaucomatous Optic Disc Topographic Parameters , 1997, Journal of glaucoma.

[30]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  M. Kass,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  CONFIRMATION OF VISUAL FIELD ABNORMALITIES IN THE OCULAR HYPERTENSION TREATMENT STUDY (OHTS) , 1999 .

[33]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[34]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  J L Keltner,et al.  Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[36]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[37]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Primary open-angle glaucoma in blacks: a review. , 2003, Survey of ophthalmology.

[38]  Chris A Johnson,et al.  Classification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[39]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study: study design and baseline factors. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.