The high impact of collaborative social initiatives

Corporate social responsibility has become a vital part of the business conversation. The issue for most companies is no longer whether to engage in socially responsible activities but how to achieve the maximum benefit from the resources available for social projects while still increasing shareholder value. In this article, the authors draw on years of quantitative and case-based studies of major corporations to conclude that CSR activities work best for society and the corporate participants when they are managed strategically and in collaboration with an array of commercial and noncommercial partners. The authors cite exemplars such as Avon Products, whose name is synonymous with responses to women?s healthcare issues, and The Home Depot, whose foundation involves suppliers and government agencies in large-scale efforts to combat housing problems in the United States. The authors point to five core principles behind effective CSR strategies, from the need to contribute "what we do" to the importance of accommodating government?s regulatory and taxation influences.

[1]  R. Alsop The 18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation , 2006 .

[2]  Lorraine Eden Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society , 2004 .

[3]  Ronald J. Alsop,et al.  The 18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation: Creating, Protecting, and Repairing Your Most Valuable Asset , 2004 .

[4]  Bryan W. Husted,et al.  Governance Choices for Corporate Social Responsibility: to Contribute, Collaborate or Internalize? , 2003 .

[5]  N. Smith,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? , 2003 .

[6]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[7]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[8]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations , 2003 .

[9]  Jay J. Janney,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[10]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  People and profits? : the search for a link between a company's social and financial performance , 2001 .

[11]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .

[13]  Archie B. Carroll,et al.  Giving Back : An Examination of the Philanthropic Motivations , Orientations and Activities of Vickie Cox Edmondson Large Black-Owned Businesses Archie , 1999 .

[14]  Bradley R. Agle,et al.  The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance , 1999 .

[15]  George Balabanis,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: are they linked? , 1998 .

[16]  Sarah D. Stanwick,et al.  The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[17]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[18]  J. Logsdon,et al.  How corporate social responsibility pays off , 1996 .

[19]  Craig Smith The new corporate philanthropy , 1994 .

[20]  Frederick R. Post,et al.  A moral basis for corporate philanthropy , 1993 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .