Rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome by a single, pre-hospital troponin measurement: a randomized trial

Abstract Aims Patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are routinely transferred to the emergency department (ED). A clinical risk score with point-of-care (POC) troponin measurement might enable ambulance paramedics to identify low-risk patients in whom ED evaluation is unnecessary. The aim was to assess safety and healthcare costs of a pre-hospital rule-out strategy using a POC troponin measurement in low-risk suspected NSTE-ACS patients. Methods and results This investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial was conducted in five ambulance regions in the Netherlands. Suspected NSTE-ACS patients with HEAR (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors) score ≤3 were randomized to pre-hospital rule-out with POC troponin measurement or direct transfer to the ED. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome of 30-day healthcare costs. Secondary outcome was safety, defined as 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), consisting of ACS, unplanned revascularization or all-cause death. : A total of 863 participants were randomized. Healthcare costs were significantly lower in the pre-hospital strategy (€1349 ± €2051 vs. €1960 ± €1808) with a mean difference of €611 [95% confidence interval (CI): 353–869; P < 0.001]. In the total population, MACE were comparable between groups [3.9% (17/434) in pre-hospital strategy vs. 3.7% (16/429) in ED strategy; P = 0.89]. In the ruled-out ACS population, MACE were very low [0.5% (2/419) vs. 1.0% (4/417)], with a risk difference of −0.5% (95% CI −1.6%–0.7%; P = 0.41) in favour of the pre-hospital strategy. Conclusion Pre-hospital rule-out of ACS with a POC troponin measurement in low-risk patients significantly reduces healthcare costs while incidence of MACE was low in both strategies. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05466591 and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform id NTR 7346.

[1]  D. Atar,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of a rule-out algorithm of acute myocardial infarction in low-risk patients: emergency primary care versus hospital setting , 2022, BMC Health Services Research.

[2]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Referral decisions based on a pre-hospital HEART score in suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: final results of the FamouS Triage study , 2021, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[3]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2021, Circulation.

[4]  E. Hess,et al.  2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  S. Hofma,et al.  Prehospital risk stratification in patients with chest pain , 2021, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[6]  Robert F. Riley,et al.  Prehospital use of a modified HEART Pathway and point-of-care troponin to predict cardiovascular events , 2020, PloS one.

[7]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2020, European heart journal.

[8]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Pre-hospital versus hospital acquired HEART score for risk classification of suspected non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. , 2020, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Damman,et al.  Acute rule-out of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the (pre)hospital setting by HEART score assessment and a single point-of-care troponin: rationale and design of the ARTICA randomised trial , 2020, BMJ Open.

[10]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  In-Hospital Healthcare Utilization, Outcomes, and Costs in Pre-Hospital-Adjudicated Low-Risk Chest-Pain Patients , 2019, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

[11]  M. Levi,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of the acute care systems in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands: what can we learn from each other? , 2019, BMC Emergency Medicine.

[12]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Predictive value of routine point-of-care cardiac troponin T measurement for prehospital diagnosis and risk-stratification in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction , 2019, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[13]  S. Aryal,et al.  HEART Score Risk Stratification of Low-Risk Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  B. Wells,et al.  Safely Identifying Emergency Department Patients With Acute Chest Pain for Early Discharge: HEART Pathway Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol , 2018, Circulation.

[15]  S. Goodacre,et al.  Do all HEART Scores beat the same: evaluating the interoperator reliability of the HEART Score , 2018, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[16]  L. Hakkaart-van Roijen,et al.  Update of the Dutch manual for costing studies in health care , 2017, PLoS ONE.

[17]  P. Doevendans,et al.  Effect of Using the HEART Score in Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  E. Giannitsis,et al.  Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Point-of-Care Cardiac Troponin T Test with an Improved Detection Limit. , 2017, Clinical laboratory.

[19]  L. Newby,et al.  Does This Patient With Chest Pain Have Acute Coronary Syndrome?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. , 2015, JAMA.

[20]  M. Koopmanschap,et al.  The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: A Standardized Instrument for Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Productivity Losses. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[21]  F. Cots,et al.  Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? , 2013, BMJ.

[22]  Li-Jung Liang,et al.  Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[23]  R. Twerenbold,et al.  How safe is the outpatient management of patients with acute chest pain and mildly increased cardiac troponin concentrations? , 2012, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  Y. Hasin,et al.  The challenge of chest pain in the emergency room: now and the future. , 2011, European heart journal.

[25]  James McCord,et al.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[26]  H. Litt,et al.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[27]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[28]  Maureen Chase,et al.  Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[29]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care.

[30]  Joanna Young,et al.  A 2-hour diagnostic protocol for possible cardiac chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.