Speciation without changes in genital shape: A case study on Brazilian pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae)

[1]  N. E..  Why copulatory organs provide so many useful taxonomic characters : the origin and maintenance of hemipenial differences in lacertid lizards ( Reptilia : Lacertidae ) , 2007 .

[2]  W. Eberhard.  Male–female conflict and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[3]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual selection and genital evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  B. Huber.  The significance of copulatory structures in spider systematics , 2004 .

[5]  J. Bond,et al.  Gradual evolution of male genitalia in a sibling species complex of millipedes (Diplopoda:Spirobolida:Rhinocricidae:Anadenobolus) , 2003 .

[6]  B. Huber,et al.  Female genital dimorphism in a spider (Araneae: Pholcidae) , 2001 .

[7]  H. Tatsuta,et al.  Allometric Patterns of Heads and Genitalia in the Stag Beetle Lucanus maculifemoratus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) , 2001 .

[8]  B. Huber.  THE PHOLCIDS OF AUSTRALIA (ARANEAE; PHOLCIDAE): TAXONOMY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND RELATIONSHIPS , 2001 .

[9]  B. Huber,et al.  A New Genus of Pholcid Spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae) Endemic to Western Cuba, with a Case of Female Genitalic Dimorphism , 2001 .

[10]  S. Mawatari,et al.  Morphological difference and reproductive isolation: morphometrics in the millipede Parafontaria tonominea and its allied forms , 2001 .

[11]  P. Laiolo,et al.  Allometric relationships and character evolution in Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) , 2000 .

[12]  B. Huber.  NEW WORLD PHOLCID SPIDERS (ARANEAE: PHOLCIDAE): A REVISION AT GENERIC LEVEL , 2000 .

[13]  Rudolf Meier,et al.  Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory , 2000 .

[14]  Rudolf Meier,et al.  Species concepts and phylogenetic theory : a debate , 2000 .

[15]  B. Huber.  Genital mechanics in some neotropical pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae), with implications for systematics , 1998 .

[16]  W. Eberhard,et al.  ONE SIZE FITS ALL? RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SIZE AND DEGREE OF VARIATION IN GENITALIA AND OTHER BODY PARTS IN TWENTY SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  T. Teder,et al.  Limited Variability of Genitalia in the Genus Pimpla (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): Inter- or Intraspecific Causes? , 1998 .

[18]  T. Tanabe,et al.  Revision of the millipede genus Xystodesmus, with reference to the status of the tribe Xystodesmini (Diplopoda: Xystodesmidae) , 1996 .

[19]  Jonathan A. Coddington,et al.  PROBLEMS WITH ZERO‐LENGTH BRANCHES , 1994 .

[20]  L. Hribar.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION OF MALE GENITALIA OF ANOPHELES NUNEZTOVARI (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) , 1994 .

[21]  D. Goulson.  Variation in the genitalia of the butterfly Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) , 1993 .

[22]  Fernando G. Costa,et al.  Analyse expérimentale de l'isolement reproductif entre deux espèces jumelles et sympatriques d'araignées : le Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling) et le Lycosa carbonelli Costa et Capocasale , 1991 .

[23]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Sexual Selection And Animal Genitalia , 1985 .

[24]  H. W. Levi.  The orb-weaver genera Araniella and Nuctenea lAraneaec Araneidaer , 1974 .

[25]  J. Hollander,et al.  Pardosa vlijmi sp. nov., a new ethospecies sibling Pardosa proxima (C.L. Koch, 1848), from France, with description of courtship display (Araneae, Lycosidae) , 1974 .

[26]  H. W. Levi,et al.  The spider genera Gea and Argiope in America (Araneae: Araneidae) , 1968 .