A study about the demand for air movement in warm environment

Abstract As the main regulation tool of indoor thermal environment in warm seasons, air-conditioners are used to keep a cool environment. However, this causes problems of huge energy consumption and poor indoor air quality. In contrast, electric fans promise an indoor cooling effect with lower energy consumption. This makes the exploration of air flow utilization significative. This paper discusses the results of a research with both an online survey and a series of climate chamber experiment to study user requirements for air movement in their daily life. The online survey results showed that electric fans were widely accepted in both homes and offices because they were environmental friendly, low-cost and could provide a fresh feeling. The results of climate chamber experiment identified suitable range of indoor temperature to use electric fans and their corresponding range of air speeds. The air flow generated by electric fans could be used as an effective cooling method to maintain a comfortable environment at 28 °C–32 °C. Compared with the acceptable range of temperature and air speeds for the comfort zone recommended by the ASHRAE Standard 55-2010, this study showed that air speeds over 0.8 m/s were acceptable and they could offset a higher temperature. With reasonable utilization, electric fans could provide a healthy and energy-efficient way to control indoor environment.

[1]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  Impact of dynamic airflow on human thermal response. , 2006, Indoor air.

[2]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Locally controlled air movement preferred in warm isothermal environments , 1994 .

[3]  Hiroko Kubo,et al.  Cooling effects of preferred air velocity in muggy conditions , 1997 .

[4]  R. Dedear.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[5]  Surat Atthajariyakul,et al.  Small fan assisted air conditioner for thermal comfort and energy saving in Thailand , 2008 .

[6]  Christhina Cândido,et al.  Towards a Brazilian standard for naturally ventilated buildings: guidelines for thermal and air movement acceptability , 2011 .

[7]  Shinichi Tanabe,et al.  Effects of air temperature, humidity, and air movement on thermal comfort under hot and humid conditions , 1994 .

[8]  K. F. Fong,et al.  Thermal sensation of Hong Kong people with increased air speed, temperature and humidity in air-conditioned environment , 2010 .

[9]  D. Wyon,et al.  The Acceptable Air Velocity Range for Local Air Movement in The Tropics , 2006 .

[10]  Arsen Krikor Melikov,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality ( IEQ ) Title Energy saving and improved comfort by increased air movement , 2008 .

[11]  J. Toftum,et al.  Air movement--good or bad? , 2004, Indoor air.

[12]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Combined thermal acceptability and air movement assessments in a hot humid climate , 2011 .

[13]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Air temperature thresholds for indoor comfort and perceived air quality , 2011 .

[14]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[15]  Gail Brager,et al.  Air movement preferences observed in office buildings , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[16]  Edward Arens,et al.  Air movement and thermal comfort , 1993 .

[17]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  New standards for comfort and energy use in buildings , 2009 .

[18]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[19]  Joseph Khedari,et al.  Assessment of Thailand indoor set-point impact on energy consumption and environment , 2006 .

[20]  Thananchai Leephakpreeda,et al.  Real-time determination of optimal indoor-air condition for thermal comfort, air quality and efficient energy usage , 2004 .

[21]  R. Dear,et al.  Air movement acceptability limits and thermal comfort in Brazil's hot humid climate zone , 2010 .

[22]  Richard Aynsley,et al.  Quantifying the Cooling Sensation of Air Movement , 2008 .

[23]  Edward Arens,et al.  Moving Air for Comfort , 2009 .