A Rhythmic Bias in Preverbal Speech Segmentation

Four studies using a variant of the conditioned head turning procedure, in which response latencies to extraneous noises occurring at different junctures within synthetic syllable strings served as the dependent variable, investigated 6- and 9-month-old infants’ representations of familiar and novel syllable pairs manifesting diverse rhythmic patterns. Familiar bisyllables tended to be perceived similarly by both age groups: These bisyllables were perceived as being cohesive, without regard to whether they manifested trochaic (longer ‐ shorter) or iambic (shorter ‐ longer) rhythm. Novel bisyllables were perceived differently by the two age groups. Six-montholds appeared to perceive segmentally novel, but rhythmically familiar, bisyllables as cohesive, whereas they failed to perceive rhythmically novel, but segmentally familiar bisyllables in the same fashion. Similar patterns of results were obtained with trochaic and iambic bisyllables. Nine-month-olds, however, were differentially sensitive to different rhythmic patterns. Older infants appeared to perceive novel bisyllables as cohesive only when they manifested trochaic rhythm, whether the bisyllables were segmentally or rhythmically novel. Nine-month-olds’ behavior is consistent with the possibility that they have adopted a metrical strategy for segmentation, as A. Cutler (1990 and elsewhere) has argued is the case for novice and expert English speakers alike. The plausibility of such a strategy with respect to the nature of child-directed speech is discussed, as are possible consequences for acquisition of such a strategy. q 1996

[1]  C. A. Ferguson Baby Talk in Six Languages , 1964 .

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[3]  Z S Bond,et al.  Phonological Units in Sentence Perception , 1972, Phonetica.

[4]  R. Brown A First Language , 1973 .

[5]  P. Dale,et al.  Discrimination of linguistic stress in early infancy. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  E. Bard,et al.  The unintelligibility of speech to children , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and syntax , 1984 .

[8]  H. Gleitman,et al.  The current status of the motherese hypothesis , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The use of prosodic information in word recognition , 1984 .

[10]  Norman A. Krasnegor,et al.  Measurement of Audition and Vision in the First Year of Postnatal Life: A Methodological Overview , 1985 .

[11]  N. Bernstein-Ratner Dissociations between vowel durations and formant frequency characteristics. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[13]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation , 1991 .

[15]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .

[16]  J. Mehler,et al.  Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese , 1993 .

[17]  K. Demuth,et al.  The prosodic structure of early words , 1996 .