Effect of supplementary firing options on cycle performance and CO2 emissions of an IGCC power generation system

Supplementary firing is adopted in combined-cycle power plants to reheat low-temperature gas turbine exhaust before entering into the heat recovery steam generator. In an effort to identify suitable supplementary firing options in an integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power plant configuration, so as to use coal effectively, the performance is compared for three different supplementary firing options. The comparison identifies the better of the supplementary firing options based on higher efficiency and work output per unit mass of coal and lower CO2 emissions. The three supplementary firing options with the corresponding fuel used for the supplementary firing are: (i) partial gasification with char, (ii) full gasification with coal and (iii) full gasification with syngas. The performance of the IGCC system with these three options is compared with an option of the IGCC system without supplementary firing. Each supplementary firing option also involves pre-heating of the air entering the gas turbine combustion chamber in the gas cycle and reheating of the low-pressure steam in the steam cycle. The effects on coal consumption and CO2 emissions are analysed by varying the operating conditions such as pressure ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature, air pre-heat and supplementary firing temperature. The results indicate that more work output is produced per unit mass of coal when there is no supplementary firing. Among the supplementary firing options, the full gasification with syngas option produces the highest work output per unit mass of coal, and the partial gasification with char option emits the lowest amount of CO2 per unit mass of coal. Based on the analysis, the most advantageous option for low specific coal consumption and CO2 emissions is the supplementary firing case having full gasification with syngas as the fuel. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Terry Wall,et al.  Combustion processes for carbon capture , 2007 .

[2]  Sudipta De,et al.  Performance study of a partial gasification pressurized combustion topping gas cycle and split rankine combined cycle: Part I— Energy analysis , 2003 .

[3]  Janez Oman,et al.  Efficiency of a combined gas-steam process , 1999 .

[4]  S. Channiwala,et al.  A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels , 2005 .

[5]  Chakib Bouallou,et al.  CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle , 2007 .

[6]  Bale V. Reddy,et al.  Exergy analysis of a natural gas fired combined cycle power generation unit , 2007 .

[7]  Bale V. Reddy,et al.  Parametric analysis of a coal based combined cycle power plant , 2006 .

[8]  P. K. Nag,et al.  Performance simulation of heat recovery steam generators in a cogeneration system , 1998 .

[9]  V. Ramaprabhu,et al.  A Computational Model of a Combined Cycle Power Generation Unit , 2004 .

[10]  E. A. Sondreal,et al.  Review of advances in combustion technology and biomass cofiring , 2001 .

[11]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance , 2006 .

[12]  S De,et al.  Effect of supplementary firing on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant , 2000 .

[13]  S De,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a partial gasification pressurized combustion and supercritical steam combined cycle , 2000 .

[14]  T. Muneer,et al.  Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies , 2007 .

[15]  Hongguang Jin,et al.  A novel combined cycle with synthetic utilization of coal and natural gas , 2007 .

[16]  Luis M. Romeo,et al.  Integration of power plant and amine scrubbing to reduce CO2 capture costs , 2008 .

[17]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Assessing and improving the efficiencies of a steam power plant using exergy analysis. Part 2: improvements from modifying reheat pressure , 2006 .

[18]  Martin Kautz,et al.  The externally-fired gas-turbine (EFGT-Cycle) for decentralized use of biomass , 2007 .

[19]  A. Franco,et al.  Perspectives for the use of biomass as fuel in combined cycle power plants , 2005 .

[20]  S. Raghuvanshi,et al.  Carbon dioxide emissions from coal based power generation in India , 2006 .

[21]  Anne-Gaëlle Collot,et al.  Matching gasification technologies to coal properties , 2006 .

[22]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Improving steam power plant efficiency through exergy analysis: effects of altering excess combustion air and stack-gas temperature , 2008 .

[23]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Optimum gas turbine cycle for combined cycle power plant , 2008 .

[24]  Mario Amelio,et al.  Integrated gasification gas combined cycle plant with membrane reactors: Technological and economical analysis , 2007 .

[25]  Xiaojun Shi,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of an LNG fuelled combined cycle power plant with waste heat recovery and utilization system , 2007 .

[26]  D. Raha,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a coal-based combined cycle power plant , 1995 .