Making history: intentional capture of future memories

Lifelogging' technology makes it possible to amass digital data about every aspect of our everyday lives. Instead of focusing on such technical possibilities, here we investigate the way people compose long-term mnemonic representations of their lives. We asked 10 families to create a time capsule, a collection of objects used to trigger remembering in the distant future. Our results show that contrary to the lifelogging view, people are less interested in exhaustively digitally recording their past than in reconstructing it from carefully selected cues that are often physical objects. Time capsules were highly expressive and personal, many objects were made explicitly for inclusion, however with little object annotation. We use these findings to propose principles for designing technology that supports the active reconstruction of our future past.

[1]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Collaborating around collections: informing the continued development of photoware , 2004, CSCW.

[2]  G. Brahm,et al.  Prosthetic Territories: Politics And Hypertechnologies , 1995 .

[3]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Informing augmented memory system design through autobiographical memory theory , 2008, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[4]  S. Turkle,et al.  Evocative objects : things we think with , 2007 .

[5]  K. Nelson,et al.  The emergence of autobiographical memory: a social cultural developmental theory. , 2004, Psychological review.

[6]  J. Brockmeier,et al.  Autobiographical Remembering as Cultural Practice: Understanding the Interplay between Memory, Self and Culture , 2002 .

[7]  Frédéric Vernier,et al.  Personal digital historian: story sharing around the table , 2003, INTR.

[8]  Martin A. Conway,et al.  Memory and the self , 2005 .

[9]  G. Bell,et al.  A digital life , 2007 .

[10]  Vaiva Kalnikaité,et al.  Software or wetware?: discovering when and why people use digital prosthetic memory , 2007, CHI.

[11]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty , 2004, INTR.

[12]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[13]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  AutoTopography: what can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? , 2008, CHI.

[14]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The meaning of things: Coding categories and definitions , 1981 .

[15]  Steve Mann,et al.  Continuous lifelong capture of personal experience with EyeTap , 2004, CARPE'04.

[16]  K. Lillios,et al.  Objects of Memory: The Ethnography and Archaeology of Heirlooms , 1999 .

[17]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam , 2007, CHI.

[18]  Lorna M. Brown,et al.  Sonic interventions: understanding and extending the domestic soundscape , 2008, CHI.

[19]  David Frohlich,et al.  The Memory Box , 2000 .

[20]  P. Connerton How Societies Remember , 1989 .

[21]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Ageing and Memory: Mechanisms Underlying Age Differences in Performance , 1998 .

[22]  Asaf Gilboa,et al.  Autobiographical and episodic memory—one and the same? Evidence from prefrontal activation in neuroimaging studies , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Recognizing context for annotating a live life recording , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[24]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  How do people manage their digital photographs? , 2003, CHI '03.

[25]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Getting into the Living Memory Box: Family archives & holistic design , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[26]  Dave W. Randall,et al.  The past is a different place: they do things differently there , 2008, DIS '08.

[27]  Herng-Dar Bih,et al.  The meaning of objects in environmental transitions: Experiences of chinese students in the united states , 1992 .

[28]  Judy Kay,et al.  MEMENTO: a digital-physical scrapbook for memory sharing , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.