Collusion via Information Sharing and Optimal Auctions

This paper studies collusion via information sharing in the context of auctions. The model of collusion via information sharing builds on Aumann’s (1976) description of knowledge. Robustness of auction mechanisms to collusion via information sharing is defined as the impossibility of an agreement to collude. A cartel can agree to collude on a contract if it is common knowledge within that cartel that the contract is incentive compatible and individually rational. Robust mechanisms are characterized in a number of settings where some, all, or no bidders are bound by limited liability. Finally, the characterization is used in a simple IPV setting to design a mechanism that is both optimal and robust to collusion.

[1]  Robert C. Marshall,et al.  Bidder collusion , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[2]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  George J. Mailath,et al.  Collusion in second price auctions with heterogeneous bidders , 1991 .

[4]  D. Graham,et al.  Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single-Object Second-Price and English Auctions , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Nancy L. Stokey,et al.  Information, Trade, and Common Knowledge , 1982 .

[6]  R. Aumann Agreeing to disagree. , 1976, Nature cell biology.

[7]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[8]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Collusion-resistant mechanisms for single-parameter agents , 2005, SODA '05.

[9]  N. Gruyer Optimal Auctions When a Seller is Bound to Sell to Collusive Bidders , 2008 .

[10]  O. Gorelkina Bidder Collusion and the Auction with Target Bids , 2014 .

[11]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Optimal collusion-proof auctions , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Françoise Forges,et al.  Core-Stable Rings in Auctions with Independent Private Values , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[13]  John McMillan,et al.  DANGO: JAPAN'S PRICE-FIXING CONSPIRACIES , 1991 .

[14]  Kim-Sau Chung,et al.  Auction Design with Tacit Collusion , 2003 .

[15]  E. Maskin Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality , 1999 .

[16]  R. Myerson Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem , 1979 .

[17]  Silvio Micali,et al.  Collusion, efficiency, and dominant strategies , 2017, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  Margaret C. Levenstein,et al.  What Determines Cartel Success? , 2002 .

[19]  Martin Pesendorfer A Study of Collusion in First-Price Auctions , 2000 .

[20]  T. Ungern-Sternberg,et al.  Cartel Stability in Sealed Bid Second Price Auctions , 1988 .

[21]  Silvio Micali,et al.  Collusive dominant-strategy truthfulness , 2012, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  Andrzej Skrzypacz,et al.  Tacit collusion in repeated auctions , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[23]  James Schummer,et al.  Manipulation through Bribes , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[24]  Shiran Rachmilevitch,et al.  Bribing in first-price auctions , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[25]  Gregory Pavlov,et al.  Auction design in the presence of collusion , 2008 .

[26]  Masaki Aoyagi,et al.  Bid rotation and collusion in repeated auctions , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[27]  Vianney Dequiedt,et al.  Efficient collusion in optimal auctions , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[28]  Robert H. Porter,et al.  Collusion in Auctions , 1989 .

[29]  David Martimort,et al.  Collusion under Asymmetric Information , 1997 .

[30]  P. Reny,et al.  On the failure of the linkage principle in multi-unit auctions , 1999 .

[31]  R. Porter,et al.  Detection of Bid Rigging in Procurement Auctions , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  Marc S. Robinson,et al.  Collusion and the Choice of Auction , 1985 .

[34]  Felix J. Bierbrauer,et al.  Robustly Coalition-Proof Incentive Mechanisms for Public Good Provision are Voting Mechanisms and Vice Versa , 2016 .

[35]  Jerry R. Green,et al.  Partially Verifiable Information and Mechanism Design , 1986 .

[36]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  The Cascade Auction - A Mechanism for Deterring Collusion in Auctions , 2013, AAAI.