A Cell Adhesion-Based Reconstitution Method for Studying Cell Polarity

Cell polarity is an evolutionarily conserved process of asymmetric spatial organization within cells and is essential to tissue structure, signal transduction, cell migration, and cell division. The establishment and maintenance of polarity typically involves extensive protein-protein interactions that can be made further intricate by cell cycle-dependent regulation. These aspects can make interpreting phenotypes within traditional in vivo genetic systems challenging due to pleiotropic effects in loss-of-function experiments. Minimal reconstitution methods offer investigators the advantage of stricter control of otherwise complex systems and allow for more direct assessment of the role of individual components to the process of interest. Here I provide a detailed protocol for a cell adhesion-based method of inducing cell polarity within non-polarized Drosophila S2 cells. This technique is simple, cost effective, moderate throughput, and amenable to RNAi-based loss-of-function studies. The ability to “plug-and-play” genes of interest allows investigators to easily assess the contribution of individual protein domains and post-translational modifications to their function. The system is ideally suited to test not only the requirement of individual components but also their sufficiency, and can provide important insight into the epistatic relationship among multiple components in a protein complex. Although designed for use within Drosophila cells, the general premise and protocol should be easily adapted to mammalian cell culture or other systems that may better suit the interests of potential users.

[1]  I. Schneider,et al.  Cell lines derived from late embryonic stages of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1972, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[2]  I. Dupin,et al.  Classical cadherins control nucleus and centrosome position and cell polarity , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  S. Bowman,et al.  The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[4]  G. C. Rogers,et al.  Culture of Drosophila S2 cells and their use for RNAi-mediated loss-of-function studies and immunofluorescence microscopy , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[5]  Matthew C. Gibson,et al.  Cell division and the maintenance of epithelial order , 2014, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Xavier Morin,et al.  Regulation of mitotic spindle orientation: an integrated view , 2016, EMBO reports.

[7]  Y. Bellaïche,et al.  The Fz-Dsh planar cell polarity pathway induces oriented cell division via Mud/NuMA in Drosophila and zebrafish. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[8]  K. Keren,et al.  Symmetry breaking in reconstituted actin cortices , 2014, eLife.

[9]  D. Pellman,et al.  Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes. , 2008, Genes & development.

[10]  R. Vale,et al.  Biophysical Mechanism of T Cell Receptor Triggering in a Reconstituted System , 2012, Nature.

[11]  D. Strickland,et al.  Cell cycle entry triggers a switch between two modes of Cdc42 activation during yeast polarization , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  C. Doe,et al.  Canoe binds RanGTP to promote PinsTPR/Mud-mediated spindle orientation , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  S. van den Heuvel,et al.  Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo , 2018, bioRxiv.

[14]  Y. Shimono,et al.  Immunoglobulin superfamily receptors and adherens junctions. , 2012, Sub-cellular biochemistry.

[15]  Maya L. Gosztyla,et al.  Keeping It Clean: The Cell Culture Quality Control Experience at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , 2019, bioRxiv.

[16]  A. Genovesio,et al.  An RNAi Screen in a Novel Model of Oriented Divisions Identifies the Actin-Capping Protein Z β as an Essential Regulator of Spindle Orientation , 2017, Current Biology.

[17]  R. Kemler,et al.  Classical cadherins. , 1992, Seminars in cell biology.

[18]  C. A. Johnston,et al.  Cell Fate Decision Making through Oriented Cell Division , 2015, Journal of developmental biology.

[19]  Luis M. Escudero,et al.  Echinoid is a component of adherens junctions that cooperates with DE-Cadherin to mediate cell adhesion. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[20]  C. A. Johnston,et al.  Warts Phosphorylates Mud to Promote Pins-Mediated Mitotic Spindle Orientation in Drosophila, Independent of Yorkie , 2015, Current Biology.

[21]  P. Schwille,et al.  More from less – bottom-up reconstitution of cell biology , 2019, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  C. Doe,et al.  Identification of an Aurora-A/PinsLINKER/ Dlg Spindle Orientation Pathway using Induced Cell Polarity in S2 Cells , 2009, Cell.

[23]  Masako Okumura,et al.  Dynein–Dynactin–NuMA clusters generate cortical spindle-pulling forces as a multi-arm ensemble , 2018, eLife.

[24]  Christoph Sommer,et al.  Machine learning in cell biology – teaching computers to recognize phenotypes , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[25]  Mark Peifer,et al.  The Drosophila afadin homologue Canoe regulates linkage of the actin cytoskeleton to adherens junctions during apical constriction , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  C. Doe,et al.  The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  K. Prehoda,et al.  Inscuteable Regulates the Pins-Mud Spindle Orientation Pathway , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  K. Prehoda,et al.  A NudE/14-3-3 pathway coordinates dynein and the kinesin Khc73 to position the mitotic spindle. , 2013, Developmental cell.

[29]  C. A. Johnston,et al.  Molecular pathways regulating mitotic spindle orientation in animal cells , 2013, Development.

[30]  I. Macara,et al.  Organization and execution of the epithelial polarity programme , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Petra Schwille,et al.  Reconstitution of self-organizing protein gradients as spatial cues in cell-free systems , 2014, eLife.

[32]  Keeping It Clean: The Cell Culture Quality Control Experience at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , 2020, SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D.

[33]  M. Théry,et al.  Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[34]  C. Doe,et al.  Formin-mediated actin polymerization cooperates with Mushroom body defect (Mud)–Dynein during Frizzled–Dishevelled spindle orientation , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[35]  C. A. Johnston,et al.  Dishevelled Binds the Discs Large ‘Hook’ Domain to Activate GukHolder-Dependent Spindle Positioning in Drosophila , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  Benjamin Lin,et al.  Toward total synthesis of cell function: Reconstituting cell dynamics with synthetic biology , 2016, Science Signaling.

[37]  Matloob Khushi,et al.  Automated classification and characterization of the mitotic spindle following knockdown of a mitosis-related protein , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[38]  R. Wollman,et al.  Genes Required for Mitotic Spindle Assembly in Drosophila S2 Cells , 2007, Science.

[39]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  D. St Johnston,et al.  Discs Large Links Spindle Orientation to Apical-Basal Polarity in Drosophila Epithelia , 2013, Current Biology.

[41]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation , 2007, Nature.

[42]  Manuel Théry,et al.  The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  Liedewij Laan,et al.  Minimal in vitro systems shed light on cell polarity , 2019, Journal of Cell Science.

[44]  C. Doe,et al.  Microtubule-Induced Pins/Gαi Cortical Polarity in Drosophila Neuroblasts , 2005, Cell.

[45]  Li Yang,et al.  The transcriptional diversity of 25 Drosophila cell lines. , 2011, Genome research.

[46]  K. Garcia,et al.  In vitro reconstitution of T cell receptor-mediated segregation of the CD45 phosphatase , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Clemens Cabernard,et al.  Control of asymmetric cell division. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.