Simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo planar imaging for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast.

OBJECTIVES Readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) significantly reduces susceptibility artifacts in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the breast compared to single-shot EPI but is limited by longer scan times. To compensate for this, we tested a new simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acquisition for accelerated rs-EPI. MATERIALS AND METHODS After approval by the local ethics committee, eight healthy female volunteers (age, 38.9 ± 13.1 years) underwent breast MRI at 3T. Conventional as well as two-fold (2× SMS) and three-fold (3× SMS) slice-accelerated rs-EPI sequences were acquired at b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm(2). Two independent readers analyzed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in fibroglandular breast parenchyma. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was estimated based on the subtraction method. ADC and SNR were compared between sequences by using the Friedman test. RESULTS The acquisition time was 4:21 min for conventional rs-EPI, 2:35 min for 2× SMS rs-EPI and 1:44 min for 3× SMS rs-EPI. ADC values were similar in all sequences (mean values 1.62 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s, p=0.99). Mean SNR was 27.7-29.6, and no significant differences were found among the sequences (p=0.83). CONCLUSION SMS rs-EPI yields similar ADC values and SNR compared to conventional rs-EPI at markedly reduced scan time. Thus, SMS excitation increases the clinical applicability of rs-EPI for DWI of the breast.

[1]  J. Polimeni,et al.  Blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g‐factor penalty , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  G. Douaud,et al.  Scan time reduction for readout‐segmented EPI using simultaneous multislice acceleration: Diffusion‐weighted imaging at 3 and 7 Tesla , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  T. Helbich,et al.  Improved Diagnostic Accuracy With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, and 3-Dimensional Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Shigeru Nawano,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[5]  Ning-Yu An,et al.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  Qian Wu,et al.  Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[9]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Clinical and technical considerations for high quality breast MRI at 3 tesla , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[11]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal‐to‐noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32‐channel cardiac coil , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[14]  Shangang Liu,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging in assessing pathological response of tumor in breast cancer subtype to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  T. Helbich,et al.  Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Noninvasive Imaging Biomarker for the Differentiation of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[16]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[17]  Huanzhou Yu,et al.  Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  T. Helbich,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? , 2009, Radiology.

[19]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[20]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[21]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  T. Helbich,et al.  Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T. , 2015, Radiology.

[23]  D. Porter,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Single-Shot and Readout-Segmented Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Stroke Patients at 3 T , 2013, Acta radiologica.

[24]  Hui Li,et al.  Comparison of image quality and application values on different field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[25]  Davide Caramella,et al.  The role of mean diffusivity (MD) as a predictive index of the response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a preliminary study , 2010, European Radiology.

[26]  David Atkinson,et al.  Nonlinear phase correction of navigated multi‐coil diffusion images , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Wolfgang Bogner,et al.  Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T. , 2012, Radiology.

[28]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  High resolution diffusion‐weighted imaging using readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two‐dimensional navigator‐based reacquisition , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  S. Hahn,et al.  Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion‐weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.