A family base optimization of a developed nonlinear vehicle suspension model using gray family design algorithm

The primary purpose of this paper is to present a novel algorithm for designing a family of variants. This platform base algorithm is utilized for designing suspension system for a family of Renault Logan cars. In this case, a gray penalty function is presented to minimize variations between suspension parameters and generate suspension variants which have most commonality between each other in different cars of the family. This study developed a nonlinear mathematical model in order to simulate the dynamic performance of suspension system. Therefore, a novel suspension model is presented based on combining vehicle vibration model and geometry suspension model which are subjected to a random vibration road profile excitation and gray family design algorithm. Geometry suspension model analyzes the effect of suspension parameters (i.e., hard points, length of arms, camber angle and caster angle) on the stability, ride and handling of the vehicle. Vehicle vibration model investigates the influence of seat location, damping and spring coefficients on the driver seat acceleration, roll angular and pitch angular acceleration, relative displacement and sprung mass acceleration. The results achieved by the simulation of the full vehicle in ADAMS/CAR and experimental test of Renault Logan car, which have been done in one of main Iranian automakers (SAIPA), demonstrate the accuracy of the novel model. Comparing the results of the family base suspension model and results of ADAMS/CAR simulation indicates the beneficial of this algorithm and its usage in designing suspension system.

[1]  Wen-Fang Xie,et al.  New model and simulation of Macpherson suspension system for ride control applications , 2009 .

[2]  Dongpu Cao,et al.  Editors’ perspectives: road vehicle suspension design, dynamics, and control , 2011 .

[3]  Dan Jiang,et al.  A modular method of developing an eco-product family considering the reusability and recyclability of customer products , 2014 .

[4]  Margarida F. Machado,et al.  A new model for dry and lubricated cylindrical joints with clearance in spatial flexible multibody systems , 2011 .

[5]  Jimoh O. Pedro,et al.  Evolutionary algorithm-based PID controller tuning for nonlinear quarter-car electrohydraulic vehicle suspensions , 2014 .

[6]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Optimization of Vehicle Suspension Systems for Improved Comfort of Road Vehicles Using Flexible Multibody Dynamics , 2003 .

[7]  Shijia Liu,et al.  A study of product family design DNA based on product style , 2009, 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design.

[8]  Xiaobin Ning,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Car Suspension Using ADAMS/Car for Development of a Software Interface for Optimization , 2011 .

[9]  Yong Yang,et al.  Study on ride comfort of tractor with tandem suspension based on multi-body system dynamics , 2009 .

[10]  Zhan Shu,et al.  Passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters with multiple performance requirements , 2014 .

[11]  Michael J. Scott,et al.  Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation , 2006 .

[12]  Nader Nariman-Zadeh,et al.  Pareto optimization of a five-degree of freedom vehicle vibration model using a multi-objective uniform-diversity genetic algorithm (MUGA) , 2010, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Kongde He,et al.  Semi-active Suspension of a Full-vehicle Model based on Double-loop Control , 2011 .

[14]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Advances in product family and product platform design: Methods & applications , 2014 .

[15]  Won Tae Kwon,et al.  Optimization of EDM process for multiple performance characteristics using Taguchi method and Grey relational analysis , 2010 .

[16]  Hazem Ali Attia,et al.  Dynamic modelling of the double wishbone motor-vehicle suspension system , 2002 .

[17]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Variation-Based Method for Product Family Design , 2002 .

[18]  Mohammad Hassan Shojaeefard,et al.  An efficient sensitivity analysis method for modified geometry of Macpherson suspension based on Pearson correlation coefficient , 2017 .

[19]  Waguih ElMaraghy,et al.  Product Families and Platforms Diversification: Customer Expectations, Product Variations, or Self-competition? , 2014 .

[20]  Yixiong Feng,et al.  Product platform two-stage quality optimization design based on multiobjective genetic algorithm , 2009, Comput. Math. Appl..

[21]  Samik Raychaudhuri,et al.  Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[22]  Rahmi Guclu Fuzzy Logic Control of Seat Vibrations of a Non-Linear Full Vehicle Model , 2005 .

[23]  David G. Beale,et al.  Base Dynamic Parameter Estimation of a MacPherson Suspension Mechanism , 2003 .

[24]  Mohamed Bouazara,et al.  An optimization method designed to improve 3-D vehicle comfort and road holding capability through the use of active and semi-active suspensions , 2001 .

[25]  P. E. Uys,et al.  Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speeds , 2007 .

[26]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .

[27]  Omer Gundogdu Optimal seat and suspension design for a quarter car with driver model using genetic algorithms , 2007 .

[28]  Péter Gáspár,et al.  Set-based analysis of the variable-geometry suspension system , 2014 .

[29]  Antonio Moreno Ortiz,et al.  Nonlinear optimization of a new polynomial tyre model , 2014 .

[30]  Yanfei Jin,et al.  Stochastic optimal active control of a half-car nonlinear suspension under random road excitation , 2013 .