The viable decision maker for CAS survival: how to change and adapt through fitting process

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the decision-making process in the management of the complex adaptive systems (CAS), particularly focusing on the dimensions that affect the individual decision maker (DM) when passing from decision to behavior in fitting processes. Although the importance of the general process of fitting in terms of organizational design has been highlighted in earlier studies, a closer focus on the DM perspective is required. Design/methodology/approach Starting from the theoretical frameworks of viable systems approach (vSa) and addressing the evolving concepts of change and adaptation in CAS, the work takes the DM perspective and investigates the dimensions involved in the paths that lead complex decisions into behaviors, when referring to fitting processes. The paper reviews the vSa and the concept of CAS, deepening the decision making in fitting processes. Then, the paper proceeds to discuss the schemes and the categories that affect, at different levels, the decision and behavioral choices by proposing an interpretative framework. Findings The paper proposes a general framework useful to recognize/identify which are the elements/dimensions that have to be considered when organizations change in pursuing survival. The findings of the paper also show how adopting a vSa as a meta-model can be insightful to the understanding of service systems and useful in fully comprehending decision-making processes and behavior in complex adaptive system. Originality/value The originality of this paper lies in exploring the decision making process in CAS, adopting a closer perspective on the single DM through the lens of the vSa.

[1]  Francesco Caputo,et al.  From ‘Ego’ to ‘Eco’ in B2B Relationships , 2013 .

[2]  Russ Marion,et al.  Organizational Extinction and Complex Systems , 1999 .

[3]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Configurational Fit: Pathway for Successful Value Co-Creation , 2010 .

[4]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[5]  Mario Calabrese,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Measuring Value Creation Based on Viable Systems Approach (VSA) , 2013 .

[6]  Luca Carrubbo.  La Co-creazione di valore nelle destinazioni turistiche , 2013 .

[7]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Reflections on Service Systems Boundaries: A Viable Systems Perspective – The Case of the London Borough of Sutton , 2012 .

[8]  Richard Butler,et al.  Designing Organizations: A Decision-Making Perspective , 1991 .

[9]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The age of temporary advantage , 2010 .

[10]  H. Coleman,et al.  What Enables Self-Organizing Behavior in Businesses , 1999 .

[11]  Luca Carrubbo,et al.  The Contribution of VSA and SDL Perspectives to Strategic Thinking in Emerging Economies , 2014 .

[12]  M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.  Complexity : the emerging science and the edge of order and chaos , 1992 .

[13]  S. Maguire,et al.  Complexity and Management: Moving From Fad To Firm Foundations , 1999 .

[14]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange , 2011 .

[15]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Viable Service Systems and Decision Making in Service Management , 2012 .

[16]  E. Glasersfeld.  An Introduction to Radical Constructivism , 1981 .

[17]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Francesco Polese,et al.  A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications , 2010 .

[19]  Michael Lissack,et al.  Complexity: the Science, its Vocabulary, and its Relation to Organizations , 1999 .

[20]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems: Applying Systems Theory to Service Science , 2010 .

[21]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[22]  M. Gell-Mann.  A Theory of Everything. (Book Reviews: The Quark and the Jaguar. Adventures in the Simple and the Complex.) , 1994 .

[23]  Heiko Wieland,et al.  Toward a Service (Eco)Systems Perspective on Value Creation , 2012, Int. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. Eng. Technol..

[24]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers , 2004 .

[25]  Francesco Polese,et al.  B2B is Not an Island , 2009 .

[26]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[27]  Roberto Parente,et al.  Strategie di co-evoluzione nei sistemi locali innovativi , 2011 .

[28]  S. Beer.  The Brain of the Firm , 1972 .

[29]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Key Dimensions of Service Systems in Value-Creating Networks , 2011, The Science of Service Systems.

[30]  Paolo Napoletano,et al.  Becoming Smarter: Towards a New Generation of Services Systems , 2011 .

[31]  David F Ballantyne,et al.  Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing , 2006 .

[32]  K. Dooley,et al.  Health Care Organizations as Complex Adaptive Systems , 2003 .

[33]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad? , 1999 .

[34]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.