Auditory Training With Frequent Communication Partners.

PURPOSE Individuals with hearing loss engage in auditory training to improve their speech recognition. They typically practice listening to utterances spoken by unfamiliar talkers but never to utterances spoken by their most frequent communication partner (FCP)-speech they most likely desire to recognize-under the assumption that familiarity with the FCP's speech limits potential gains. This study determined whether auditory training with the speech of an individual's FCP, in this case their spouse, would lead to enhanced recognition of their spouse's speech. METHOD Ten couples completed a 6-week computerized auditory training program in which the spouse recorded the stimuli and the participant (partner with hearing loss) completed auditory training that presented recordings of their spouse. RESULTS Training led participants to better discriminate their FCP's speech. Responses on the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (Dillon, James, & Ginis, 1997) indicated subjectively that training reduced participants' communication difficulties. Peformance on a word identification task did not change. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that auditory training might improve the ability of older participants with hearing loss to recognize the speech of their spouse and might improve communication interactions between couples. The results support a task-appropriate processing framework of learning, which assumes that human learning depends on the degree of similarity between training tasks and desired outcomes.

[1]  Richard A. Wright,et al.  The advantage of knowing the talker. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Efficacy of Individual Computer-Based Auditory Training for People with Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  M. Sommers,et al.  Using patient perceptions of relative benefit and enjoyment to assess auditory training. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  M. Sommers,et al.  Tailoring auditory training to patient needs with single and multiple talkers: Transfer-appropriate gains on a four-choice discrimination test , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[5]  A. Refaie,et al.  Auditory training and adult rehabilitation: a critical review of the evidence , 2011 .

[6]  Mitchell Sommers,et al.  Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[7]  R. Sweetow,et al.  The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[8]  L. Humes,et al.  Effect of Training on Word-Recognition Performance in Noise for Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Catherine V Palmer,et al.  Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  H. Dillon,et al.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  Q. Summerfield Book Review: Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound , 1992 .

[12]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[13]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[15]  R. Barnard Cognition and Second Language Instruction , 2003 .

[16]  R. Schmidt Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Attention , 2001 .