Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing: force generation and measurement.

Fibroblasts are one of the most abundant cell types in connective tissues. These cells are responsible for tissue homeostasis under normal physiological conditions. When tissues are injured, fibroblasts become activated and differentiate into myofibroblasts, which generate large contractions and actively produce extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins to facilitate wound closure. Both fibroblasts and myofibroblasts play a critical role in wound healing by generating traction and contractile forces, respectively, to enhance wound contraction. This review focuses on the mechanisms of force generation in fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and techniques for measuring such cellular forces. Such a topic was chosen specifically because of the dual effects that fibroblasts/myofibroblasts have in wound healing process- a suitable amount of force generation and matrix deposition is beneficial for wound healing; excessive force and matrix production, however, result in tissue scarring and even malfunction of repaired tissues. Therefore, understanding how forces are generated in these cells and knowing exactly how much force they produce may guide the development of optimal protocols for more effective treatment of tissue wounds in clinical settings.

[1]  M S Kolodney,et al.  Isometric contraction by fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tissue culture: a quantitative study , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  E Bell,et al.  Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[5]  B. Li,et al.  Development of micropost force sensor array with culture experiments for determination of cell traction forces. , 2007, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[6]  E Bell,et al.  Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness. , 1981, Science.

[7]  B. Hinz,et al.  Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression upregulates fibroblast contractile activity. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  A K Harris,et al.  Cell Motility and the Problem of Anatomical Homeostasis* , 1987, Journal of Cell Science.

[9]  Jeen-Shang Lin,et al.  Determining substrate displacement and cell traction fields--a new approach. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  G M Whitesides,et al.  Regulation of protrusion shape and adhesion to the substratum during chemotactic responses of mammalian carcinoma cells. , 1998, Experimental cell research.

[11]  A. Ridley.  Rho GTPases and cell migration. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[12]  B. Jockusch,et al.  Differences in the stress fibers between fibroblasts and epithelial cells , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Measurement of mechanical forces generated by skin fibroblasts embedded in a three-dimensional collagen gel. , 1991, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[14]  M Eastwood,et al.  Balanced mechanical forces and microtubule contribution to fibroblast contraction , 1996, Journal of cellular physiology.

[15]  R. Austin,et al.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. Taylor,et al.  The role of solation-contraction coupling in regulating stress fiber dynamics in nonmuscle cells , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  B. Hinz.  Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  J. Howard,et al.  Molecular dissection of the fibroblast-traction machinery. , 2004, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[19]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[20]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[21]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[22]  J. Wang,et al.  Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression enhances cell traction force. , 2007, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[23]  Traction force microscopy on-chip: shear deformation of fibroblast cells. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[24]  H. Ehrlich,et al.  Wound closure: evidence of cooperation between fibroblasts and collagen matrix , 1988, Eye.

[25]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  R. Ross,et al.  WOUND HEALING AND COLLAGEN FORMATION , 1970, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  P. Khaw,et al.  Dynamic protrusive cell behaviour generates force and drives early matrix contraction by fibroblasts , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[28]  L. Gibson,et al.  A new technique for calculating individual dermal fibroblast contractile forces generated within collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[29]  R. Bucala,et al.  Peripheral blood fibrocytes: Mesenchymal precursor cells and the pathogenesis of fibrosis , 2000, Current rheumatology reports.

[30]  Xiaoyu Zheng,et al.  An optical Moiré technique for cell traction force mapping , 2008 .

[31]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  L. Gibson,et al.  Fibroblast contractile force is independent of the stiffness which resists the contraction. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[33]  J. Dallon,et al.  A review of fibroblast‐populated collagen lattices , 2008, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[34]  S. Yumura,et al.  Molecular dynamics and forces of a motile cell simultaneously visualized by TIRF and force microscopies. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[35]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[36]  J. Wang,et al.  A multi-station dynamic-culture force monitor system to study cell mechanobiology. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[37]  Masaaki Ito,et al.  Myosin light chain phosphatase: subunit composition, interactions and regulation , 1998, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[38]  M. Sheetz,et al.  A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Michelle Wall,et al.  Modulation of collagen gel compaction by extracellular ATP is MAPK and NF-kappaB pathways dependent. , 2009, Experimental cell research.

[40]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates , 1999, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[41]  H. Ehrlich,et al.  Cell locomotion forces versus cell contraction forces for collagen lattice contraction: an in vitro model of wound contraction. , 1990, Tissue & cell.

[42]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  Giulio Gabbiani,et al.  The myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins. , 2007, The American journal of pathology.

[44]  R. Silver,et al.  Contractile activity and smooth muscle alpha-actin organization in thrombin-induced human lung myofibroblasts. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[45]  B. Hinz,et al.  Alpha-smooth muscle actin is crucial for focal adhesion maturation in myofibroblasts. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[46]  C. Myers,et al.  Rho-kinase inhibitor retards migration and in vivo dissemination of human prostate cancer cells. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[47]  Giulio Gabbiani,et al.  Mechanisms of force generation and transmission by myofibroblasts. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[48]  D. L. Taylor,et al.  Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata , 1997, Nature.

[49]  Julie H. Campbell,et al.  J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. , 2000 .

[50]  P. Howarth,et al.  Myofibroblasts and subepithelial fibrosis in bronchial asthma. , 1990, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[51]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[52]  Jeen-Shang Lin,et al.  Cell traction force and measurement methods , 2007, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[53]  S. Kasugai,et al.  Measurements of the isometric contractile forces generated by dog periodontal ligament fibroblasts in vitro. , 1990, Archives of oral biology.

[54]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Treadmill running exercise results in the presence of numerous myofibroblasts in mouse patellar tendons , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[55]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[56]  M Eastwood,et al.  A culture force monitor for measurement of contraction forces generated in human dermal fibroblast cultures: evidence for cell-matrix mechanical signalling. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[57]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[58]  B. Hinz,et al.  Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[59]  M. Toner,et al.  Microengineering of cellular interactions. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[60]  J. Wang,et al.  Spatial patterning of cell proliferation and differentiation depends on mechanical stress magnitude. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[61]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[62]  D. Powell.  Water transport revisited , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[63]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Magnetic microposts for mechanical stimulation of biological cells: fabrication, characterization, and analysis. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[64]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[65]  J. Wang,et al.  A novel functional assessment of the differentiation of micropatterned muscle cells. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[66]  J. Bereiter-Hahn,et al.  Mechanics of crawling cells. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[67]  K. Kaibuchi,et al.  Rho-Kinase–Mediated Contraction of Isolated Stress Fibers , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[68]  B. H. Campbell,et al.  TGF-β1, TGF-β3, and PGE2 regulate contraction of human patellar tendon fibroblasts , 2004 .

[69]  Mark Eastwood,et al.  Quantitative analysis of collagen gel contractile forces generated by dermal fibroblasts and the relationship to cell morphology , 1996, Journal of cellular physiology.

[70]  Junwei Yang,et al.  Dissection of key events in tubular epithelial to myofibroblast transition and its implications in renal interstitial fibrosis. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[71]  Robert T. Tranquillo,et al.  Tissue engineering science: Consequences of cell traction force , 2004, Cytotechnology.

[72]  T. Borg,et al.  Modulation of Heart Fibroblast Migration and Collagen Gel Contraction by IGF-I , 2000, Cell adhesion and communication.

[73]  Qing-Ming Wang,et al.  Cell shape regulates collagen type I expression in human tendon fibroblasts. , 2008, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[74]  B. H. Campbell,et al.  A multi-station culture force monitor system to study cellular contractility. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[75]  Albert K. Harris,et al.  Fibroblast traction as a mechanism for collagen morphogenesis , 1981, Nature.

[76]  K. Nakajima,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the factors affecting the process of fibroblast-mediated collagen gel contraction by separating the process into three phases. , 1988, Collagen and related research.

[77]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[78]  Michael T Longaker,et al.  The fibroblast‐populated collagen matrix as a model of wound healing: a review of the evidence , 2004, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.