A Modified DDE Index for Use in Epidemiological Studies of Enamel Defects

The aim of this study was to investigate possible modifications to the DDE Index to make it simpler to use and to make the data collected more meaningful and amenable to analyses and interpretation. After the use of the DDE Index in a National Study in Ireland, initial alterations to the Index were tested on a group of children with enamel defects, in Ireland and New Zealand. The DDE Index was then modified to allow for the measurement of demarcated, diffuse, and hypo-plastic defects and their severity. With the Modified Index, the prevalence of defects both on index teeth and all permanent tooth surfaces of 8-and 15-year-old children in fluoridated Cork City and non-fluoridated areas of Cork County and Manchester, U.K., was measured. The prevalence of enamel defects on one or more index teeth of children in the three areas ranged from 30 to 42% in 8-year-olds and from 31 to 38% in 15-year-olds. The percentage of children affected as seen by full-mouth examination was somewhat higher, ranging from 38 to 51 % for 8 year-olds and 58 to 63% for 15-year-olds. The percentage of index teeth affected (7 to 14%) was generally higher than for all teeth (5 to 9%). Demarcated opacities were the most common defect seen. Diffuse opacities were found to be the discriminating factor between the fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas. In all areas, the vast majority of diffuse opacities extended over less than 1/3 of the surface area of the teeth affected. As a result of this study, proposals for a single scoring DDE Index for use in general purpose and screening surveys are made. The modifications to the DDE Index allow for efficient recording of the prevalence and severity of enamel defects.

[1]  H. Horowitz.  Indexes for measuring dental fluorosis. , 1986, Journal of public health dentistry.

[2]  A. Kingman,et al.  Prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis in areas with negligible, optimal, and above-optimal fluoride concentrations in drinking water. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  N. King,et al.  Developmental defects of enamel: a study of 12-year-olds in Hong Kong. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  R. Kingdon,et al.  Prevalence of enamel developmental defects in a group of 11- and 12-year-old children in South Wales. , 1986, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology.

[5]  G. Herbison,et al.  The prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in 696 nine-year-old New Zealand children participating in a health and development study. , 1985, Community dental health.

[6]  G. Herbison,et al.  Prevalence of developmental defects of enamel and dental caries in New Zealand children receiving differing fluoride supplementation. , 1985, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[7]  T. Cutress,et al.  Defects of tooth enamel in children in fluoridated and non-fluoridated water areas of the Auckland region. , 1985, The New Zealand dental journal.

[8]  A. Kingman,et al.  A new method for assessing the prevalence of dental fluorosis--the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis. , 1984, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  G. Suckling,et al.  Developmental defects of enamel in a group of New Zealand children: their prevalence and some associated etiological factors. , 1984, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[10]  Møller Ij.  Fluorides and dental fluorosis. , 1982 .

[11]  An epidemiological index of developmental defects of dental enamel (DDE Index). Commission on Oral Health, Research and Epidemiology. , 1982, International dental journal.

[12]  I. Møller.  Fluorides and dental fluorosis. , 1982, International dental journal.

[13]  J. Murray,et al.  Classification and prevalence of enamel opacities in the human deciduous and permanent dentitions. , 1979, Archives of oral biology.

[14]  A. Thylstrup,et al.  Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. , 1978, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[15]  Cutress Tw,et al.  Developmental defects of enamel in New Zealand children. , 1976 .

[16]  P. Goward.  Enamel mottling in a non-fluoride community in England. , 1976, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[17]  T. Cutress,et al.  Developmental defects of enamel in New Zealand children. , 1976, The New Zealand dental journal.

[18]  J. Murray,et al.  Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reproducibility in clinical and radiographic diagnosis. , 1975, International dental journal.

[19]  W. B. Wolfe,et al.  Fluoridation in Anglesey. A clinical study , 1975, British Dental Journal.

[20]  P. Holloway,et al.  Partial recording in caries incremental studies in English schoolchildren. , 1975, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[21]  D. Jackson.  Errors in clinical trials. , 1966, Advances in fluorine research and dental caries prevention.

[22]  A. L. Russell.  THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF FLUORIDE AND NONFLUORIDE ENAMEL OPACITIES , 1961 .

[23]  D. Jackson.  A clinicla study of non-endemic mottling of enamel. , 1961, Archives of oral biology.

[24]  E. R. Zimmermann.  Fluoride and nonfluoride enamel opacities. , 1954, Public health reports.

[25]  E. Short.  Domestic Water and Dental Caries , 1944 .

[26]  H. T. Dean.  Domestic Water and Dental Caries. , 1943 .

[27]  H. T. Dean,et al.  Domestic Water and Dental Caries. V. Additional Studies of the Relation of Fluoride Domestic Waters to Dental Caries Experience in 4,425 White Children, Aged 12 to 14 Years, of 13 Cities in 4 States. , 1942 .

[28]  H. T. Dean.  Classification of Mottled Enamel Diagnosis , 1934 .