The SMAP and Copernicus Sentinel 1A/B microwave active-passive high resolution surface soil moisture product

Abstract Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission of NASA was launched in January 2015. Currently, SMAP has an L-band radiometer and a defunct L-band radar with a rotating 6-m mesh reflector antenna. On July 7th, 2015, the SMAP radar malfunctioned and became inoperable. Consequently, the production of high-resolution active-passive soil moisture product got hampered, and only ~2.5 months (April 15th, 2015 to July 7th, 2015) of data remain available. Therefore, during the SMAP post-radar phase, many ways were examined to restart the high-resolution soil moisture product generation of the SMAP mission. One of the feasible approaches was to substitute the SMAP radar with other available SAR data. Sentinel-1A/Sentinel-1B SAR data was found most suitable for combining with the SMAP radiometer data because of its nearly similar orbit configuration that allows overlapping of their swaths with a minimal time difference, a key feature/requirement for the SMAP active-passive algorithm. The Sentinel interferometric wide swath (IW) mode acquisition also provides the co-polarized and cross-polarized observations required for the SMAP active-passive algorithm. However, some differences do exist between the SMAP and Sentinel SAR data. They are mainly: 1) Sentinel has a C-band SAR whereas SMAP operates at L-band; 2) Sentinel has multiple incidence angles within its swath, and SMAP has one single incidence angle; and 3) Sentinel 1A/B Interferometric Wide (IW) swath width is ~250 km as compared to SMAP with 1000 km swath width. On any given day, the narrow swath width of the Sentinel observations significantly reduces the overlap spatial coverage between SMAP and Sentinel as compared to the original SMAP radar and radiometer swath coverage. Hence, the temporal resolution (revisit interval) suffers due to narrow overlapped swath width and degrades from 3 days to 12 days. One advantage of using very high-resolution resolution Sentinel-1A/Sentinel-1B data in the SMAP active-passive algorithm is the potential of obtaining the disaggregated brightness temperature and thus soil moisture at a much finer spatial resolution of 3 km and 1 km at global extent. The assessment of high-resolution product at 3 km and 1 km using the soil moisture calibration and validations sites shows reasonable accuracy of ~0.05 m3/m3. The SMAP-Sentinel1 active-passive high-resolution product is now available to the public (new version released in October 2018) through NSIDC (NASA DAAC). The duration of this product is from April 2015 to current date.

[1]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  The SMAP mission combined active-passive soil moisture product at 9 km and 3 km spatial resolutions , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[2]  Thomas Jagdhuber,et al.  Microwave covariation modeling and retrieval for the dual-frequency active-passive combination of sentinel-1 and SMAP , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[3]  Marco Mancini,et al.  Robust simulation of root zone soil moisture with assimilation of surface soil moisture data , 2001 .

[4]  Thomas Jagdhuber,et al.  Physics-Based Modeling of Active-Passive Microwave Covariations for Geophysical Retrievals , 2018, IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  E. Njoku,et al.  Passive microwave remote sensing of soil moisture , 1996 .

[6]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Development and Assessment of the SMAP Enhanced Passive Soil Moisture Product. , 2018, Remote sensing of environment.

[7]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  Tests of the SMAP Combined Radar and Radiometer Algorithm Using Airborne Field Campaign Observations and Simulated Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Global Automated Quality Control of In Situ Soil Moisture Data from the International Soil Moisture Network , 2013 .

[9]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Assessment of the SMAP Passive Soil Moisture Product , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Thomas Jagdhuber,et al.  Estimation of active-passive microwave covariation using SMAP and Sentinel-1 data , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[11]  Christoph Rüdiger,et al.  A Cumulative Distribution Function Method for Normalizing Variable-Angle Microwave Observations , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Application of Triple Collocation in Ground-Based Validation of Soil Moisture Active/Passive (SMAP) Level 2 Data Products , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Kelly K. Caylor,et al.  Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites , 2017, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[14]  Marvin N. Wright,et al.  SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  L-band vegetation optical depth and effective scattering albedo estimation from SMAP. , 2017 .

[17]  Christoph Rüdiger,et al.  Sensitivity of Sentinel-1 Backscatter to Vegetation Dynamics: An Austrian Case Study , 2018, Remote. Sens..