Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time

BackgroundAccelerometers have been used to determine the amount of time that children spend sedentary. However, as time spent sitting may be detrimental to health, research is needed to examine whether accelerometer sedentary cut-points reflect the amount of time children spend sitting. The aim of this study was to: a) examine agreement between ActiGraph (AG) cut-points for sedentary time and objectively-assessed periods of free-living sitting and sitting plus standing time using the activPAL (aP); and b) identify cut-points to determine time spent sitting and sitting plus standing.MethodsForty-eight children (54% boys) aged 8-12 years wore a waist-mounted AG and thigh-mounted aP for two consecutive school days (9-3:30 pm). AG data were analyzed using 17 cut-points between 50-850 counts·min-1 in 50 counts·min-1 increments to determine sedentary time during class-time, break time and school hours. Sitting and sitting plus standing time were obtained from the aP for these periods. Limits of agreement were computed to evaluate bias between AG50 to AG850 sedentary time and sitting and sitting plus standing time. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analyses identified AG cut-points that maximized sensitivity and specificity for sitting and sitting plus standing time.ResultsThe smallest mean bias between aP sitting time and AG sedentary time was AG150 for class time (3.8 minutes), AG50 for break time (-0.8 minutes), and AG100 for school hours (-5.2 minutes). For sitting plus standing time, the smallest bias was observed for AG850. ROC analyses revealed an optimal cut-point of 96 counts·min-1 (AUC = 0.75) for sitting time, which had acceptable sensitivity (71.7%) and specificity (67.8%). No optimal cut-point was obtained for sitting plus standing (AUC = 0.51).ConclusionsEstimates of free-living sitting time in children during school hours can be obtained using an AG cut-point of 100 counts·min-1. Higher sedentary cut-points may capture both sitting and standing time.

[1]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  M. Granat,et al.  The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[3]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  R. Mcmurray,et al.  Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  C. Matthews,et al.  Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. , 2010, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[6]  M. Clark,et al.  Interindividual Variation in Posture Allocation: Possible Role in Human Obesity , 2005, Science.

[7]  Paige C. Morgan,et al.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents , 2011, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[8]  S. Blair,et al.  Objective measurement of levels and patterns of physical activity , 2007, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[9]  S. Going,et al.  Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  T. McKenzie,et al.  Examining children's physical activity and play behaviors during school playtime over time. , 2011, Health education research.

[11]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[12]  Maurice R Puyau,et al.  A longitudinal study of fitness and activity in girls predisposed to obesity. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[14]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  Kong Y Chen,et al.  Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  C. Matthews,et al.  Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003-06. , 2011, European heart journal.

[18]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Independent associations of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness with metabolic risk factors in children: the European youth heart study , 2007, Diabetologia.

[19]  Marc T. Hamilton,et al.  Role of Low Energy Expenditure and Sitting in Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease , 2007, Diabetes.

[20]  M. Granat,et al.  The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[21]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[22]  Jo Salmon,et al.  Health risks, correlates, and interventions to reduce sedentary behavior in young people. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[23]  John J Reilly,et al.  Validity, practical utility, and reliability of the activPAL™ in preschool children. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  Russell R. Pate,et al.  The Evolving Definition of "Sedentary" , 2008, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[25]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Controlled and free-living evaluation of objective measures of sedentary and active behaviors. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[26]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  J. Salmon,et al.  Novel strategies to promote children's physical activities and reduce sedentary behavior. , 2010, Journal of physical activity & health.

[29]  A. Rowlands Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in children: an update. , 2007, Pediatric exercise science.