The results of this study indicate that, in terms of optimizing energy efficiency, variable air volume (VAV) control of supply air is the preferred method of cooling perimeter zones of pressurized underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems just as it is for overhead (OH) systems. Moreover, cooling fan energy consumption for underfloor VAV systems can be significantly less than that for overhead VAV systems. Results show also that constant air volume (CAV) systems can be an effective approach for zones, such as core areas, that have little load variation (assuming oversizing is minimized). For these situations a UFAD-CAV system can offer low installed cost, simplicity, and provide modest energy savings compared to an overhead VAV system.
[1]
T. Webster,et al.
How low can you go? air flow performance of low-height underfloor plenums
,
1999
.
[2]
Fred S P.E. Bauman,et al.
Task/ambient conditioning systems: Engineering and application guidelines - eScholarship
,
1996
.
[3]
Degenhard Sommer,et al.
Ove Arup & Partners
,
1994
.
[4]
M. F.,et al.
Bibliography
,
1985,
Experimental Gerontology.
[5]
Hui Zhang,et al.
Testing and optimizing the performance of a floor-based task conditioning system
,
1995
.
[6]
E. Mundt.
Convection flows in rooms with Temperature Gradients-Theory and Measurements
,
1992
.