Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

The authors analyze the shape categorization of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and the role of prototype- and exemplar-based comparison processes in monkeys' category learning. Prototype and exemplar theories make contrasting predictions regarding performance on the Posner-Homa dot-distortion categorization task. Prototype theory--which presumes that participants refer to-be-categorized items to a representation near the category's center (the prototype)--predicts steep typicality gradients and large prototype-enhancement effects. Exemplar theory--which presumes that participants refer to-be-categorized items to memorized training exemplars-predicts flat typicality gradients and small prototype-enhancement effects. Across many categorization tasks that, for the first time, assayed monkeys' dot-distortion categorization, monkeys showed steep typicality gradients and large prototype-enhancement effects. These results suggest that monkeys--like humans--refer to-be-categorized items to a prototype-like representation near the category's center rather than to a set of memorized training exemplars.

[1]  J.A. Anderson,et al.  Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. , 1984 .

[2]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence , 2009 .

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Prototypes in the Mist: The Early Epochs of Category Learning , 1998 .

[5]  S. Lea,et al.  Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  F. Ashby,et al.  Categorization as probability density estimation , 1995 .

[7]  P J Reber,et al.  Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Dissociations Between Categorization and Recognition in Amnesic and Normal Individuals: An Exemplar-Based Interpretation , 1998 .

[9]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[10]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. , 1988 .

[11]  D A Washburn,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), video tasks, and implications for stimulus-response spatial contiguity. , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[12]  John M. Pearce,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Discrimination and Categorization , 1994 .

[13]  P. Reber,et al.  Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory. , 1998, Learning & memory.

[14]  N. Mackintosh.  Animal learning and cognition , 1994 .

[15]  J. Cerella.  Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.

[17]  T. Palmeri,et al.  Learning About Categories in the Absence of Training: Profound Amnesia and the Relationship Between Perceptual Categorization and Recognition Memory , 1999 .

[18]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[19]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[21]  D. Homa.  Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype , 1973 .

[22]  M. Jitsumori.  A prototype effect and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli in pigeons. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[24]  A Test of the Linear Feature Model of Polymorphous Concept Discrimination with Pigeons , 1993 .

[25]  Aaron P Blaisdell,et al.  Capacity and limits of associative memory in pigeons , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  D A Washburn,et al.  Testing primates with joystick-based automated apparatus: Lessons from the Language Research Center’s Computerized Test System , 1992, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[27]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[28]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Mark Blair,et al.  As easy to memorize as they are to classify: The 5–4 categories and the category advantage , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[30]  D. Medin.  A theory of context in discrimination learning , 1975 .

[31]  D. Medin,et al.  Linear separability in classification learning. , 1981 .

[32]  D. Homa,et al.  Expanding the search for a linear separability constraint on category learning , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons all negative stimuli are not created equal , 1992 .

[34]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[35]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Exemplar Theory's Predicted Typicality Gradient Can Be Tested and Disconfirmed , 2002, Psychological science.

[36]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  D. Homa,et al.  Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. , 1981 .

[38]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Robert M Nosofsky,et al.  False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[40]  R M Nosofsky,et al.  Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  Shawn W. Ell,et al.  The neurobiology of human category learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[43]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization , 1993 .

[44]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Complex decision rules in categorization : contrasting novice and experienced performance , 1992 .

[45]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Natural concepts in pigeons. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[46]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[47]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of Abstract Ideas. , 1970 .

[48]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Stages of Abstraction and Exemplar Memorization in Pigeon Category Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[49]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Mark K. Johansen,et al.  Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  K. White,et al.  Prototype identification and categorization of incomplete figures by pigeons , 1993, Behavioural Processes.

[53]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Journey to the center of the category: the dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  M. Jitsumori.  Category Structure and Typicality Effects , 2009 .

[55]  D. Norman.  Learning and Memory , 1982 .

[56]  J. Pearce,et al.  Prototype Effects in Categorization by Pigeons , 1994 .