Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees using single-plane fluoroscopy

BackgroundAnalysis of the movement of anatomically defined reference axes at the femoral condyles relative to the tibia is appropriate for evaluating knee kinematics. However, such parameters have been previously employed only in studies utilizing stop-motion techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo dynamic kinematics for full range of motion in normal knees using the three-dimensional to two-dimensional registration technique and to compare them with previously reported normal knee kinematics obtained via stop-motion techniques.MethodsDynamic motion of the right knee was analyzed in 20 healthy volunteers (10 female, 10 male; mean age 37.2 years). Knee motion was observed when subjects squatted from standing with the knee fully extended to maximum flexion. We determined the following parameters: (1) changes to angles of the geometric center axis (GCA) on the tibial axial plane (rotation angle); (2) anteroposterior translations of the medial and lateral ends of the GCA; and (3) motion patterns in each phase during knee flexion.ResultsAll subjects exhibited femoral external rotation (26.1°) relative to the tibia throughout knee flexion. The medial femoral condyle demonstrated anterior translation (5.5 mm) from full extension to 100° flexion, and demonstrated posterior translation (3.9 mm) after 100°, while the lateral femoral condyle demonstrated consistent posterior translation (15.6 mm) throughout knee flexion. All subjects showed medial pivot motion from full extension to nearly 120° flexion. From 120° flexion, bicondylar rollback motion was observed.DiscussionAlthough the behavior of the medial femoral condyle in our analysis differed somewhat from that seen in previous cadaver studies, the results obtained using dynamic analysis were generally equivalent to those obtained in previous studies employing stop-motion techniques. These results provide control data for future dynamic kinematic analyses of pathological knees.

[1]  Y. Koga,et al.  Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  S A Banks,et al.  In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Stefan M. Gabriel,et al.  Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  J. S. Rovick,et al.  External knee joint design based on normal motion. , 1985, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics: a multicenter analysis of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  Todd Johnson,et al.  Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  B. Beynnon,et al.  The Transepicondylar Axis Approximates the Optimal Flexion Axis of the Knee , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J David Blaha,et al.  Kinematics of the Human Knee Using an Open Chain Cadaver Model , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Satoshi Hamai,et al.  Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  V. Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee , 2000 .

[11]  Masao Akagi,et al.  The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  D. Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis of the Normal Human Knee , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  P S Walker,et al.  Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  William Hoff,et al.  In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Martin Logan,et al.  Understanding tibio-femoral motion. , 2004, The Knee.

[17]  V Pinskerova,et al.  The knee in full flexion: an anatomical study. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  Takaharu Yamazaki,et al.  In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee bending motion. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  J. Tamura,et al.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Knee Kinematics Using a Biplanar Image-Matching Technique , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  V. Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI , 2000 .

[22]  Ramprasad Papannagari,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency alters the in vivo motion of the tibiofemoral cartilage contact points in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Yoshiki Yamano,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI , 2000 .

[24]  Koichi Kobayashi,et al.  Image-Based Matching for Natural Knee Kinematics Measurement Using Single-Plane Fluoroscopy , 2009 .

[25]  H. Rubash,et al.  Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.