Mass media, the 'sensational message', and metamorphic truths

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the effects of mass media's ability to rapidly spread sensational messages. With the view that the accuracy or truth of the 'sensational message' can change, either evolving naturally within our collective perception or through more deliberate ways, this then presents some scenarios in which ever more flexible notions of truth in the future may provide not only challenges but also opportunities. Using different perspectives but always with a bit of lightheartedness, two events that are separated by half a century and a vast expanse of technological advances are presented as lenses with which to examine our collective obsession of the sensational and how this obsession may influence our perspective as well as our subsequent choices. Looking towards the increasingly connected future, the challenges and economic implications of our susceptibility to sensational media are explored so that in the end, the readers will have gained insights on mass media's power to flex our notions of truth.

[1]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[2]  R. Bentley,et al.  Fashion versus reason – then and now , 2007, Antiquity.

[3]  Memory and suggestibility in older adults: live event participation and repeated interview , 2004 .

[4]  M. Pesce.  The Social Qualities of Pervasive Wireless Networks , 2007 .

[5]  Magnus Boman,et al.  Modeling Epidemic Spread in Synthetic Populations - Virtual Plagues in Massively Multiplayer Online Games , 2007, DiGRA Conference.

[6]  Yogesh V. Joshi,et al.  New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators , 2007 .

[7]  Carl P. Lipo,et al.  Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying , 2007 .

[8]  Sena Garven,et al.  Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports , 1997, Law and human behavior.

[9]  Stephanie Forrest,et al.  Email networks and the spread of computer viruses. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  J. Berry.  The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat, and What to Buy , 2003 .

[11]  L. Sigelman,et al.  When Objectivity is Not Objective: Network Television News Coverage of U.S. Senators and the "Paradox of Objectivity" , 1992, The Journal of Politics.

[12]  A. Collins,et al.  The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: the parable of the 38 witnesses. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[13]  S. Livingstone.  Debating children's susceptibility to persuasion - where does fairness come in? A commentary on the Nairn and Fine versus Ambler debate , 2009 .

[14]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[15]  B. Bollobás.  The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[16]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[17]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[18]  Sean M. Lane,et al.  How events are reviewed matters: Effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[19]  E. Anderson.  Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth , 1998 .

[20]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[22]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[23]  Arun Sharma,et al.  The Effect of Retail Atmospherics on Customers' Perceptions of Salespeople and Customer Persuasion:: An Empirical Investigation , 2000 .

[24]  Ian Pearson.  Our virtual future , 2008 .

[25]  VistaAlvin.  Mass media, the 'sensational message', and metamorphic truths , 2015 .

[26]  Gianfranco Walsh,et al.  Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Motives for and Consequences of Reading Customer Articulations on the Internet , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[27]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Theory of Rumour Spreading in Complex Social Networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[28]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[29]  Dominic Lenton.  In depth surveillance - Analysis Big brother - or big mess? , 2007 .

[30]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[31]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[32]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[33]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Event Memory and Autobiographical Memory for the Events of September 11, 2001 , 2003 .

[34]  Bill Wasik,et al.  And Then There's This: How Stories Live and Die in Viral Culture , 2009 .

[35]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[36]  Chris Hackley,et al.  An Ethical Evaluation of Product Placement: A Deceptive Practice? , 2008 .

[37]  Marshall F Chalverus,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[38]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Social Transmission, Emotion, and the Virality of Online Content , 2010 .

[39]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Drift as a mechanism for cultural change: an example from baby names , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[41]  Andrea Morrone,et al.  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , 2010 .

[42]  C. Fine,et al.  Who’s messing with my mind? , 2008 .

[43]  Peter Van Dijck,et al.  Review of The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference by Malcom Gladwell. Little Brown & Company. , 2001 .

[44]  David M. Boush,et al.  The Development of Marketplace Persuasion Knowledge in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults , 2005 .

[45]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[46]  Virginia Gewin,et al.  Disease control: Virtual plagues get real , 2004, Nature.

[47]  D. Meadows-Klue.  The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[48]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Dynamics of rumor spreading in complex networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  A. Noymer,et al.  The transmission and persistence of ‘urban legends’: Sociological application of age‐structured epidemic models , 2001, The Journal of mathematical sociology.

[50]  Mara Mather,et al.  The tenacious nature of memory binding for arousing negative items , 2009, Memory & cognition.