Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards

The closest relationships between ship management companies and shipyards begin with the initial design process of new ships and they continue during the life cycle of operating ships. Periodic docking facilities which can be recognized as the biggest logistical issue in the content of ship maintenance program are the critical processes from the viewpoint of ship owners. Hence, this process should be well-planned and organized to satisfy the various expectations such as quality of service, capacity limitations, and geographical advantages, by taking cost and time constraints into account. Hence, the selection problem with respect to several criteria to find the most suitable shipyards is getting more important for ship management companies. This paper investigates a systematic evaluation model on docking facilities of shipyards to provide a decision aid for technical ship managers and to perform this responsibility in an efficient manner. Multiple criteria fuzzy axiomatic design (FAD) approach is used for selection among shipyards since FAD lets us define the design interval of each criterion. The original contributions of the paper are seemed in both enhancing the theoretical frame of FAD in terms of managing group consensus and performing an application to a real case in maritime industry.

[1]  Brandon M. Taravella Accuracy assessment of methods for predicting dry dock block reactions , 2005 .

[2]  James W Logan,et al.  A COMPUTER-AIDED PROCES FOR ASSESSING THE ABILITY OF SHIPYARDS TO USE TECHNICAL INNOVATION , 1998 .

[3]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[4]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic design and concurrent engineering , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  C Dawson MODERN SHIPYARD TECHNOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT , 1990 .

[6]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach , 2005 .

[7]  Suren N. Dwivedi,et al.  Total value management in shipbuilding , 2003 .

[8]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Towards the Internet-based supply chain management for the ship repair industry , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[9]  Yuansheng Cheng,et al.  Optimal and robust design of docking blocks with uncertainty , 2004 .

[10]  Richard Birmingham,et al.  SHIPYARD TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES , 1997 .

[11]  Li Lin,et al.  Knowledge-based support for simulation analysis of manufacturing cells , 2001 .

[12]  Bojan Babić,et al.  Axiomatic design of flexible manufacturing systems , 1999 .

[13]  David S. Cochran,et al.  Manufacturing System Design , 1998 .

[14]  Svein I Sagatun,et al.  ROBOT TECHNOLOGY IN THE SHIPYARD PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT. , 1996 .

[15]  Markus Starkl,et al.  Decision aid systems for evaluating sustainability: a critical survey , 2004 .

[16]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[17]  Osman Kulak,et al.  A methodology for the design of office cells using axiomatic design principles , 2008 .

[18]  Qiao Wu,et al.  Evaluation and optimization of General Atomics’ GT-MHR reactor cavity cooling system using an axiomatic design approach , 2005 .

[19]  Osman Kulak,et al.  A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom , 2005 .

[21]  Harish Hirani,et al.  Journal bearing design using multiobjective genetic algorithm and axiomatic design approaches , 2005 .

[22]  Lilach Nachum United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD): World Investment Report 2000: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development United Nations, New York and Geneva 2000. (Biblio Service) , 2001 .

[23]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Aggregating Fuzzy Opinions in the Group Decision-making Environment , 1998, Cybern. Syst..

[24]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic h , 2005 .

[25]  Sang-Gook Kim,et al.  Design of software systems based on axiomatic design , 1991 .

[26]  A. I. Ölçer,et al.  A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Michael E. McDevitt,et al.  Ship Repair Workflow Cost Model , 2005 .

[28]  Beom-Seon Jang,et al.  Axiomatic design approach for marine design problems , 2002 .

[29]  António Gonçalves-Coelho,et al.  Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context: A case study , 2007 .

[30]  Chen Zhang-yi Strength Analysis of Launched Ship and Floating Docks , 2002 .

[31]  Alok K. Verma,et al.  An Integrated Lean Implementation Model for Fleet Repair and Maintenance , 2004 .